Has Fermat's Last Theorem had any practical impact on our world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Fermat's Last Theorem has significantly influenced the study of elliptic curves, which are crucial in cryptography and coding theory. While there is no direct evidence of practical applications stemming from the theorem itself, its proof has contributed to advancements in understanding prime factorization of integers. This understanding is vital for secure online transactions and encryption algorithms. The discussion raises questions about whether Wiles's proof has made factorization easier or confirmed its difficulty, impacting encryption security. Overall, the theorem's implications extend into modern mathematical applications, particularly in cryptography.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am working on a Theory of Knowledge Essay and I was thinking how the proof to Fermat's Last Theorem influenced our world. Did it have any practical impact on our world?

I am not sure if there is any concrete evidence of a practical application or something it allowed to breakthrough, but in any way, I'd like to hear your take on this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd say that Fermat's last theorem had a heavy influence on the study of elliptic curves. And elliptic curves can be used to find prime factorizations of integers. This kind of things are important in cryptography and coding theory.
 
That's great to know, thanks!
 
micromass said:
I'd say that Fermat's last theorem had a heavy influence on the study of elliptic curves. And elliptic curves can be used to find prime factorizations of integers. This kind of things are important in cryptography and coding theory.

Fermat was concerned that his online transactions weren't secure. Now he can rest easy :smile:

(edit) Or should he be nervous? Did Wiles's proof make progress on factorization easier? Or show that factorization is as difficult as the encryption algorithms need it to be?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top