Register to reply

Proof about symmetry (simple)

by hms.tech
Tags: proof, simple, symmetry
Share this thread:
hms.tech
#1
Dec23-11, 01:58 AM
P: 247
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Show that the curve is symmetrical about the x axis (without drawing the graph)
eq of the curve is : x^2 + 4y^2 = 1

also show that the curve is symmetric about the y axis
2. Relevant equations


3. The attempt at a solution

To prove that the curve was symmetric abou the x axis, i made x the subject of the equation of the curve:

x=(1-4y^2)^0.5 (can be positive or negative)

Then i used simple intuition:
let a particular value of y be "k" and the corresponding value of x be "c".
by simple calculation, we can conclude that for y=-k , x will still be equal to "c"

Can anyone guide me if this proof is enough or it lacks something, for the latter case, please provide an alternative but suitable proof.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
World's largest solar boat on Greek prehistoric mission
Google searches hold key to future market crashes
Mineral magic? Common mineral capable of making and breaking bonds
SammyS
#2
Dec23-11, 10:28 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 7,800
Quote Quote by hms.tech View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Show that the curve is symmetrical about the x axis (without drawing the graph)
eq of the curve is : x^2 + 4y^2 = 1

also show that the curve is symmetric about the y axis
2. Relevant equations


3. The attempt at a solution

To prove that the curve was symmetric abou the x axis, i made x the subject of the equation of the curve:

x=(1-4y^2)^0.5 (can be positive or negative)

Then i used simple intuition:
let a particular value of y be "k" and the corresponding value of x be "c".
by simple calculation, we can conclude that for y=-k , x will still be equal to "c"

Can anyone guide me if this proof is enough or it lacks something, for the latter case, please provide an alternative but suitable proof.
Generally, simply use the original equation. If you replace y with -y, and the resulting equation is equivalent to the original equation, then the graph is symmetric w.r.t. the x-axis.

For symmetry w,r,t, the y-axis, replace x with -x, in the original, and check to see that the result is equivalent to the original.
Mentallic
#3
Dec23-11, 10:34 AM
HW Helper
P: 3,515
It is enough proof to show that f(x)=f(-x) for symmetry about the y-axis, and f(y)=f(-y) for symmetry about the x-axis. Can you see why?
Basically, this just means you just need to show that the function doesn't change when you swap x for -x and y for -y.

edit: If I bothered to refresh the page to see if a reply was already made, we wouldn't be here right now...

hms.tech
#4
Dec23-11, 02:06 PM
P: 247
Proof about symmetry (simple)

alright, from your replies i think the method i used is correct.

So thnx guys !
cheers
HallsofIvy
#5
Dec24-11, 06:50 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,339
Yes, correct, but do you understand that everyone was telling you that you don't have to solve for one variable?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Continuum mechanics symmetry proof Introductory Physics Homework 0
Special relativity: proof of symmetry concept Introductory Physics Homework 2
Proof of transformational symmetry Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
SU(3) symmetry and simple zeros of w. f. Quantum Physics 2
Symmetry of a circle proof Introductory Physics Homework 8