How does U(1) guage symmetry lead to Maxwell's equations?

cygnet1
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Here are some questions that have been puzzling me about symmetry and charge. Any answers to any of these questions would be very helpful. Thank you.

What does U(1) gauge symmetry mean? Does anyone have a simple explanation?

Can Maxwell's equations be derived from the premise of U(1) gauge symmetry? If so, how?

Do Maxwell's equations imply U(1) symmetry?

Is there an operator to obtain the electric charge of a particle from its quantum state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cygnet1 said:
Here are some questions that have been puzzling me about symmetry and charge. Any answers to any of these questions would be very helpful. Thank you.

What does U(1) gauge symmetry mean? Does anyone have a simple explanation?

Can Maxwell's equations be derived from the premise of U(1) gauge symmetry? If so, how?

Do Maxwell's equations imply U(1) symmetry?

Is there an operator to obtain the electric charge of a particle from its quantum state?

U(1) gauge symmetry means your physics doesn't change if you add a term of the form exp(i*f(x)) (this is a local gauge symmetry, for a global one f(x) is a constant). If one thinks of the simplest terms one can write down in a Lagrangian which are unchanged by such a transformation (and are Lorentz invariant) you get what turns out to be Maxwell's Equations.Also, you could make a trivial operator but charge is always conserved in QM (or rather charge-parity-time reversal is for QFT as well) so it hardly matters.
 
cygnet1 said:
What does U(1) gauge symmetry mean? Does anyone have a simple explanation?

In physical terms it means that the partial differential equations are insensitive to boundary values of the potentials. Since the Maxwell equations are founded on U(1) symmetry they give you gauge freedom for the potentials.

Equations which comply to SU(2) symmetry for example, as often used in QM, are sensitive to boundary conditions for potentials.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top