Integral of Bessel Function of the First Kind

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definite integral of the Bessel function of the first kind, specifically showing that the integral from 0 to infinity equals 1. Participants reference various mathematical tools and theorems relevant to this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of Parseval's theorem and the symmetry of the Bessel function. There are discussions about the notation used in the equations and the implications of the Heaviside step function. Some participants question the validity of changing the order of integration and the assumptions made regarding the Fourier transform.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various ideas being proposed and refined. Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between the integral and its Fourier transform, while others are clarifying notation and addressing potential misunderstandings. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There are also references to specific equations and a picture that is not visible in the thread.

Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to show that the definite integral (from 0 to infinity) of the Bessel function of the first kind (i.e.Jo(x)) goes to 1.


Homework Equations


All of the equations which I was given to do this problem are shown in the picture I have attached. However, I believe the result shown in part (b) is most relevant.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have fully worked through parts (a) and (b) of this question; however, I am unsure about how to attack this last problem. I was wondering if Parseval's theorem may be useful here but that has been my most recent thoughts on it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • bessel.jpg
    bessel.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 4,381
Physics news on Phys.org
am i missing something, or what is that theta in the 2nd last formula?

I think you're probably on the right track, parseval's coupled with the eveness of the function should do it
 
that theta is just my prof's way of writing a Heaviside step function
 
i thought so, but bit confusing with the notation, probably confused other responder stoo... however that should simplify the integral

starting with parseval's and symmetry (even), you have:
2\int_0^{\infty}J_0(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}J_0(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}J_0(x)dx <br /> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{J}_0(k)dk = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\theta(1-|k|)\frac{2}{\sqrt{1-k^2}}

now for a given k, where is the heaviside function 0?
 
lanedance said:
i thought so, but bit confusing with the notation, probably confused other responder stoo... however that should simplify the integral

starting with parseval's and symmetry (even), you have:
2\int_0^{\infty}J_0(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}J_0(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}J_0(x)dx <br /> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\tilde{J}_0(k)dk = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk\theta(1-|k|)\frac{2}{\sqrt{1-k^2}}

now for a given k, where is the heaviside function 0?

Doesn't Parseval's relation relate to the Modulus Squared of the function and its Fourier transform?
 
good point, and sorry for the silly mistake, was running out the door to meet the missus, now as an idea that needs work... starting with what you want to evaluate
\int_0^{\infty}dx J_0(x) = \int_0^{\infty}dx \int_0^{\infty}dk e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k)

now assuming we can change the order of integration...
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k)

which gives
= \int_0^{\infty}dk ( e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k) )|_0^{\infty}

the
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \tilde{J}_0(k)

so it's worth seeing what that integrates to and whether the order change is valid...
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
good point, and sorry for the silly mistake, was running out the door to meet the missus, now as an idea that needs work... starting what you want to evaluate, is the following
\int_0^{\infty}dx J_0(x) = \int_0^{\infty}dx \int_0^{\infty}dk e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k)

now assuming we can change the order of integration...
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k)

which gives
= \int_0^{\infty}dk ( e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k) )|_0^{\infty}

the
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \tilde{J}_0(k)

so it's worth seeing what that integrates to and whether the order change is valid...

I seem to see a problem with the first integration, over x. There should be i and k terms coming down from that integration, sadly. Unless I'm making a silly mistake.
 
Last edited:
glad you're on the ball tonight... more ideas
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx \\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{\pi} ( e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k) )

= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx\frac{1}{\pi} (cos(kx) - isin(kx)) \tilde{J}_0(k) )

and as we know the function is real, we only need keep the real part for the integral...
=\frac{1}{\pi} \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty} cos(kx) \tilde{J}_0(k)
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
glad you're on the ball tonight... more ideas
= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx \\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{\pi} ( e^{-ikx} \tilde{J}_0(k) )

= \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty}dx\frac{1}{\pi} (cos(kx) - isin(kx)) \tilde{J}_0(k) )

and as we know the function is real, we only need keep the real part for the integral...
=\frac{1}{\pi} \int_0^{\infty}dk \int_0^{\infty} cos(kx) \tilde{J}_0(k) )

I think that this might work, but I think the way that we should approach it is to use the fact that we know that the function and the Fourier transform are even, and then we are allowed to do the following:

\int_0^{\infty}dx J_0(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx J_0(x)

Then we can say:

\frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx J_0(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk e^{ikx} \tilde{J_0}

Now, switch the order of integration, and the J-tilde doesn't depend on x, so we can write

= \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk \tilde{J_0} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx e^{ikx}

The second integral is the Fourier transform of 1 which is

2\pi \delta(k)

So integrating over k pulls out the value of J-tilde at k = 0, which is 2 (see above posts).
Then we have the desired result

\int_0^{\infty}dx J_0(x) = \frac{1}{4\pi} 2*2*\pi = 1
 
  • #10
Thanks for all the help! That was an interesting problem
 
  • #11
Hi All
I need your support for solution for this equation in attached
please I need fast reply for my ask
 

Attachments

  • eq.....png
    eq.....png
    4.1 KB · Views: 986
  • #12
any body answer me because I relley need this solution or factorial for this eq. in attahced
 
  • #13
Hi mkk123 - welcome to PF!

This is an old closed post, no point re-opening. You should post new questions as new questions in the forum - way more people will look at it that way
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K