Register to reply

Is every empty set function continuous?

by julypraise
Tags: continuous, function
Share this thread:
Mar6-12, 04:35 PM
P: 110
Can I use the definition of continuity of function from Baby Rudin, setting X as empty set?

Rudin does not specify X is a non-empty set but he supposes p is in X.

Anyway if I use it for empty set X, then is a function with a domain E which is a subset of X continuous at p?

One more extra question: If a definition contains two statements that contradict each other in its hypotheses, what happens? (I know if a theorem contains these things, then the theorem becomes vacuously true.)

Note: for the Rudin's definition, please look at the attatched file.
Attached Thumbnails
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
'Office life' of bacteria may be their weak spot
Lunar explorers will walk at higher speeds than thought
Philips introduces BlueTouch, PulseRelief control for pain relief
Mar6-12, 06:02 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,500
The function in question is not continuous at any particular point p, because there aren't any points. However, the functionis continuous on the empty set, because it had no points. Another way to think about it is if the function is discontinuous you have to be able to produce a point where continuity fails, and you can't

I think you're confused by the definition of vacuously true. If two statements in a theorem contradict each other, the theorem can't be true

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Example of continuous function that is not piecewise continuous Calculus 0
Linear function F continuous somewhere, to prove continuous everywhere Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Is the anti-derivative of a continuous function continuous? Calculus 13
Continuous limited function, thus uniformly continuous Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Continuous function from Continuous functions to R Calculus & Beyond Homework 2