Is every empty set function continuous?


by julypraise
Tags: continuous, function
julypraise
julypraise is offline
#1
Mar6-12, 04:35 PM
P: 110
Can I use the definition of continuity of function from Baby Rudin, setting X as empty set?

Rudin does not specify X is a non-empty set but he supposes p is in X.

Anyway if I use it for empty set X, then is a function with a domain E which is a subset of X continuous at p?

One more extra question: If a definition contains two statements that contradict each other in its hypotheses, what happens? (I know if a theorem contains these things, then the theorem becomes vacuously true.)

Note: for the Rudin's definition, please look at the attatched file.
Attached Thumbnails
K-7.jpg  
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
Office_Shredder
Office_Shredder is offline
#2
Mar6-12, 06:02 PM
Mentor
P: 4,499
The function in question is not continuous at any particular point p, because there aren't any points. However, the functionis continuous on the empty set, because it had no points. Another way to think about it is if the function is discontinuous you have to be able to produce a point where continuity fails, and you can't

I think you're confused by the definition of vacuously true. If two statements in a theorem contradict each other, the theorem can't be true


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Example of continuous function that is not piecewise continuous Calculus 0
Linear function F continuous somewhere, to prove continuous everywhere Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Is the anti-derivative of a continuous function continuous? Calculus 13
continuous limited function, thus uniformly continuous Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Continuous function from Continuous functions to R Calculus & Beyond Homework 2