Register to reply

Electronic configuration for ions

by Log
Tags: configuration, electronic, ions
Share this thread:
Feb8-13, 01:07 PM
P: 23
When we try to predict electronic configurations by the building up principle we add electrons to the d-orbitals before the p-orbitals for principal quantum numbers n ≥ 4.

What I don't understand is why, according to my textbook, we're supposed to remove electrons from np-orbitals first, then ns-orbitals and then (n-1)d-orbitals when predicting the configuration for cations.

Why do we add electrons to (n-1)d-orbitals after ns-orbitals but remove electrons from ns-orbitals before (n-1)d-orbitals? - makes no sense.

Furthermore, if someone could explain or point me somewhere to an explanation as to how the energy levels are calculated (why E((n-1)d) > E(ns) for n ≥ 4) that would be great.
Phys.Org News Partner Chemistry news on
Chemists create nanofibers using unprecedented new method
Nanostructured metal-oxide catalyst efficiently converts CO2 to methanol (w/ Video)
Researchers discover low-grade nonwoven cotton picks up 50 times own weight of oil
Feb8-13, 01:19 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,571
Because it makes a difference whether you are comparing neutral atoms or an atom and an ion.
On ionization the ordering of the orbitals becomes more hydrogen like, i.e. the splitting of the s, p, and d orbitals decreases.
Feb8-13, 01:27 PM
P: 23
I see, thanks - for the answer to my other question as well!

I'm guessing this is beyond undergraduate courses?

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Electronic configuration Quantum Physics 2
Electronic Configuration of Fe+ Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 4
Electronic configuration Chemistry 1
Electronic configuration Chemistry 3
Electron configuration for ions Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 2