Understanding SHM: Calculating the Wave Function of a Simple Harmonic Wave

AI Thread Summary
The wave function of a simple harmonic wave is represented by the equation y(x,t)=Asin(ωt+kx), derived from solving Newton's second law of motion. This involves setting up a differential equation, where ω is defined as √(k/m). However, there is confusion regarding the context, as the original question pertains to classical physics rather than quantum mechanics. Some participants argue that the Schrödinger equation is not relevant for classical simple harmonic motion. The discussion highlights the ambiguity in the question and the distinction between classical and quantum harmonic oscillators.
Saxby
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
What is the wave function of a simple harmonic wave?

y(x,t)=Asin(ωt+kx)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
y(x,t)=Asin(ωt+kx) is the equation of motion for a simple harmonic oscillator.

You get this by solving Newton's force law..

F=ma=-kx \\<br /> ma+kx=0 \\<br /> a+\frac{k}{m}x=0
Or you can write

\ddot{x}+\frac{k}{m}x=0

This is a differential equation, solved by Asin(ωt+kx), where \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}.

I'm not sure if this answers your question?
 
Last edited:
sleepycoffee said:
y(x,t)=Asin(ωt+kx) is the equation of motion for a simple harmonic oscillator.

You get this by solving Newton's force law..

F=ma=-kx \\<br /> ma+kx=0 \\<br /> a+\frac{k}{m}x=0
Or you can write

\ddot{x}+\frac{k}{m}x=0

This is a differential equation, solved by Asin(ωt+kx), where \omega = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}.

I'm not sure if this answers your question?
He was asking for the wave function. You need to solve it with the Schrodinger equation, not Newtons laws.
 
This is posted in classical physics, however.. and in any case if it is undergoing simple harmonic motion then it isn't a quantum harmonic oscillator, so I don't see any reason to be messing around with Schrodingers.
 
sleepycoffee said:
This is posted in classical physics, however.. and in any case if it is undergoing simple harmonic motion then it isn't a quantum harmonic oscillator, so I don't see any reason to be messing around with Schrodingers.
Fair enough, it is a bit ambiguous eh?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top