Why Is PQ Approximated as rΔθ in Small Angles?

AI Thread Summary
The approximation PQ ≈ rΔθ is valid for small angles, where PQ represents the arc length in circular motion. As the angle Δθ approaches zero, the sine of the angle approximates the angle itself, leading to the conclusion that PQ simplifies to rΔθ. This relationship is derived from the distance formula, where Δr is negligible in circular motion. The discussion emphasizes that this approximation becomes exact in the limit as Δθ approaches zero. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing the rotation of rigid bodies.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
Could someone please explain why PQ in the diagram below is rΔθ? Isn't rΔθ arc length?

The best reason I can think of is that it's only an approximation for when the angle is very small, so PQ≈arclength=rΔθ. Not 100% sure though.

http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/199/feynmanangle.jpg

The diagram is from the first volume of the Feynman lectures in 18-3, in the section where he talks about rotation of rigid bodies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is an approximation for small ##\Delta \theta##, right. I would expect that it is used in a differential somewhere, where the approximation gets exact.
 
Thanks mfb
 
Start with the actual distance:

PQ = sqrt(Δr2 + (r sin(Δθ))2)

If this is circular motion, then Δr = 0, and as Δθ -> 0, then sin(Δθ) -> Δθ, and you end up with lim Δθ -> 0 of sqrt((r sin(Δθ))2) -> sqrt((r Δθ)2) -> r Δθ.

If r is some function of θ, then as long as Δr approaches zero more rapidly than r sin(Δθ), then lim Δθ -> 0 of f(Δr, r sin(Δθ)) -> f(0, r sin(Δθ)).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top