NASA Solar Probe Plus to hit 0.067% of c

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zincshow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nasa Probe Solar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the NASA Solar Probe Plus mission, particularly its expected speed of 0.067% of the speed of light and the relativistic effects that may be observed both inside the spacecraft and from Earth. Participants explore theoretical implications of relativistic physics, including time dilation, signal shifts, and the behavior of onboard technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the person and equipment inside the spacecraft are at rest relative to the spacecraft itself, regardless of its speed, referencing the concept of frame of reference.
  • One participant calculates the size of relativistic effects, suggesting a time dilation of about 7 seconds per Earth year, which may not be observable without a precise onboard clock.
  • Another participant discusses the potential for the spacecraft to act as a transponder for precision timing, indicating that relativistic orbit precession could be detectable.
  • There is a proposal regarding the expected behavior of signals and clocks during the spacecraft's journey towards and away from the Sun, including blue and red shifts and the synchronization of clocks upon return to Earth.
  • A participant draws a parallel to the Twin Paradox, suggesting that the path taken through spacetime affects the proper time experienced by the spacecraft compared to coordinate time at infinity.
  • Another participant corrects a mathematical expression related to time dilation, emphasizing the need to divide by c² in the context of relativistic effects in circular orbits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relativistic effects and their implications, with no consensus reached on the specifics of how these effects will manifest or be measured. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the time dilation and signal shifts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the precision of onboard clocks, the definitions of time dilation in different contexts, and the unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented.

zincshow
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
In 2018, NASA will launch "Solar Probe Plus" in an orbit that will swing by close to the sun. It is expected to reach speeds as high as 450,000 mph (0.067 percent the speed of light). At what speed would you (if you were inside the spacecraft ) start to see relativistic effects inside the spacecraft and what would they be? - ie. do transistors and computers continue to work no matter what the speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zincshow said:
In 2018, NASA will launch "Solar Probe Plus" in an orbit that will swing by close to the sun. It is expected to reach speeds as high as 450,000 mph (0.067 percent the speed of light). At what speed would you (if you were inside the spacecraft ) start to see relativistic effects inside the spacecraft and what would they be? - ie. do transistors and computers continue to work no matter what the speed?

The person, and all the stuff, inside a spaceship is at rest regardless of the speed of the ship. Google "frame of reference".
 
For that spacecraft , the size of relativistic effects that we would observe is about (1/2)*(v/c)2, or about 2*10-7 in this case. That implies a time dilation of about 7 seconds per (Earth) year. So we won't be able to see its time dilation unless it has a very good onboard clock.

But one can use the spacecraft as a transponder for precision timing, and one may be able to see not only the signals' time delay near the Sun, but also the spacecraft 's relativistic orbit precession.

Solar Probe Plus: A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun
Missions - Solar Probe Plus - NASA Science

It will get to about 9.5 solar radii from the Sun, and it will be traveling at about 200 km/s when there.

From http://solarprobe.jhuapl.edu/ spacecraft /mission-design.php , its closest approach will be about 0.04 AU with an aphelion of 0.73 AU and a period of about 88 days. Its GR precession is about 200 seconds of arc per century, or 0.5 seconds per orbit. That's about 300 km at aphelion or 900 microseconds of light travel time. That's more than the relativistic time delay for a radio signal passing near the Sun, so it should be detectable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lpetrich said:
... So we won't be able to see its time dilation unless it has a very good onboard clock...

Hey thanks, let's say it did have a good clock, which of the statements would be true about what observers here on Earth will see:

When going towards the sun
1. the radio signal and visual image will be blue shifted
2. we assume the clock on the spacecraft will be going slower than our clocks

When coming back towards earth
1. the radio signal and visual image will be red shifted
2. we assume the clock on the spacecraft will be going faster than our clocks
3. when (and if of course) the spacecraft gets back close to Earth the spacecraft clock will show exactly the same time have as ours, having slowed down on the way there and sped up coming back.
 
Seems like a case of the Twin Paradox. In general, if one goes from space-time point A to space-time point B, then the faster and more back-and-forth one's path is, the less proper time one will see between A and B.

One's time will be slower than coordinate time at infinity by

dt(proper)/dt(coordinate) = 1 - (1/2)*v2 + V

where V is the gravitational potential = - GM/r
 
Oops, should have divided by c2:

dt(proper)/dt(coordinate) = 1 - (1/2)*(v/c)2 + V/c2

For a circular orbit, we get

dt(proper)/dt(coordinate) = 1 - (3/2)*(GM/rc2)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K