Register to reply

Is distant starlite coherant?

by brianhurren
Tags: coherant, distant, starlite
Share this thread:
brianhurren
#1
May7-13, 10:00 AM
P: 35
by the time light from a distant star reaches us, lets say from Canopus, does the light become coherent?

and if it is coherent, can you make an astrohologram?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
A new approach in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence: targeting alien polluters
Lives and deaths of sibling stars
Australian researchers pioneer a 'Google street view' of galaxies
Simon Bridge
#2
May7-13, 10:20 AM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 12,417
How do you mean "coherent"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_(physics)
... like a laser you mean?
Short answer: no.
Chronos
#3
May9-13, 04:18 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,359
Perhaps you meant polarized instead of coherent. That too is essentially untrue. You can test this yourself by viewing stars through a polarized lens, then rotate the lens 90 degrees and see if the stars changes in brightness. Star light can be mildly polarized due to scattering by dust particles over vast distances and also by strong magnetic fields on the star.

Simon Bridge
#4
May9-13, 07:10 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 12,417
Is distant starlite coherant?

... possibly just thinking of the light being parallel?
@brianhurren: any of this useful?
Varadha
#5
May9-13, 09:31 PM
P: 28
If two observers are near, the light rays from such a distance source may be considered as coherent because, the angle between the light rays is too small and negligible. Theoretically, this assumption is valid
Simon Bridge
#6
May9-13, 11:09 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 12,417
Like this?
http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/09/...ics-coherence/
... OP has yet to logon since that post - but it's early days yet.
HallsofIvy
#7
May10-13, 07:19 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,310
Quote Quote by Varadha View Post
If two observers are near, the light rays from such a distance source may be considered as coherent because, the angle between the light rays is too small and negligible. Theoretically, this assumption is valid
Saying that light rays are parallel does not mean they are coherent.
Varadha
#8
May10-13, 10:09 PM
P: 28
Quote Quote by HallsofIvy View Post
Saying that light rays are parallel does not mean they are coherent.
Oh. Sorry. I thought any parallel rays in phase are coherent
davenn
#9
May10-13, 10:17 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
davenn's Avatar
P: 2,464
Quote Quote by Varadha View Post
Oh. Sorry. I thought any parallel rays in phase are coherent
yes they are, but that wasnt in your statement earlier, you didnt mention anything about them being in phase

Dave


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Why do we see distant objects? General Physics 22
Starlite: revolutionary material? General Discussion 13
Interferance coherant sources Advanced Physics Homework 0
Most distant galaxy Cosmology 6