Free expansion of a Van der Waals gas, physical explanation

AI Thread Summary
During free expansion of a Van der Waals gas, the gas cools down due to intermolecular attractions that require energy to overcome, leading to a decrease in temperature. Unlike ideal gases, where internal energy remains unchanged during adiabatic expansion, the Van der Waals gas experiences a temperature drop because the attractions between particles play a significant role. The temperature change is described by a specific formula that highlights the influence of particle attraction and volume change. As the gas expands, the potential energy associated with molecular attraction increases, resulting in a decrease in kinetic energy and temperature. This interplay between kinetic and potential energy is crucial to understanding the cooling effect in Van der Waals gases during free expansion.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
Hello!
Today I've learned that when a Van der Waals gas undergoes a free expansion, it cools down a bit. :bugeye:
This is in contrast with the ideal gas in which case since it does no work and since the process is adiabatic, the internal energy of the ideal gas remains unchanged by the expansion and since the temperature of the gas depends strictly on its internal energy, the temperature remains unchanged.
However for a Van der Waals gas, one has ##\Delta T=\frac{2an}{3R} \left ( \frac{1}{V_f} - \frac{1}{V_i} \right )##. Where a is, according to Wikipedia:
WikiTheGreat said:
a measure of the attraction between the particles
.
So the change of temperature doesn't seem to depend on the size of the gas' particles, only on the attraction between particles and the change in volume.

I don't really grasp it physically. What's going on for a Van der Waals gas during a free expansion? Why is the temperature going down?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conceptual explanation seems straight forward to me : If there are attractions between
the gas molecules then heat energy from the surroundings will be required to overcome them
during expansion. And of course that heat will be released during compression.
 
morrobay said:
The conceptual explanation seems straight forward to me : If there are attractions between
the gas molecules then heat energy from the surroundings will be required to overcome them
during expansion. And of course that heat will be released during compression.

Ah bingo!
That makes sense, thank you.

Edit: Hmm I'm not really sure. If I'm not wrong for both the ideal and Van der Waals gas, the total energy remains unchanged, no heat is being released/absorbed from the surrounding during the free expansion and no work is done either.
I'm still at a loss.
 
Imagine there is no change in internal energy (as the gas can expand into a vacuum in an adiabatic bath).

Consider the interplay between kinetic and potential energy of the gas.
 
Jorriss said:
Imagine there is no change in internal energy (as the gas can expand into a vacuum in an adiabatic bath).
Yeah I noticed.
Joriss said:
Consider the interplay between kinetic and potential energy of the gas.

Hmm I'm not sure at all.
Apparently the kinetic energy decreases because the temperature decreases during the expansion? This would mean that the potential energy increases (is is the enthalpy?). But I don't get really understand why this happens.
Ah.. I think it's because the molecules are getting farther away from each other so the potential energy of "attraction" between the molecules increases. Since the total energy must remain constant, this means that the kinetic energy has to lower, and hence the temperature.
Does that sound correct?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top