Unitary spacetime translation operator

omephy
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Srednicki eqn. (2.23) and (2.24) states: We can make this a little fancier by defining the unitary spacetime translation operator

T(a) \equiv \exp(-iP^\mu a_\mu/ \hbar)

Then we have
T(a)^{-1} \phi(x) T(a) = \phi(x-a)

How do we get the second equation from the first equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you believe eq. (2.22) just above this, then you can plug ##\phi(x) = e^{-iPx/\hbar}\phi(0)e^{+iPx/\hbar}## into eq. (2.24). Then using the definition of ##T(a)## you can verify that eq. (2.24) holds.
 
Lovely answer.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top