# Drag in aerodynamics

by dtms1
Tags: aerodynamics, drag
 P: 3 Why is it important to ensure flow separation does not occur in the back of a vehicle or wing? I know that when flow separation occurs its when you have a large differential pressure which in turn cause turbulence and drag. I understand that with more drag you have less efficiency. But if it it occurs behind the object (tail end of the car for example) wouldn't be okay since the object in motion is already in front of the flow separation? How is the wake behind the object physically affects the car or wing?
 PF Patron P: 749 The wake creates a pressure differential, as you pointed out. That pressure differential makes it harder to move forward. That is why it is called drag.
 P: 4 You need to realize that air pressure pushes on an object in all directions front and back. In motion, more pressure piles up in front, but if the flow was able to avoid separation completely, it actually balances the frontal pressure completely. Then all forces cancel out and there is no drag. But in real life, flow separation always occurs due to the formation of a boundary layer that weakens as the flow goes over to the back. This separation destroys the formation of the equalizing back pressure and replaces it with turbulent air, which is weaker. The excess of frontal pressure over the weakened back pressure is what we call drag.
P: 1,316

## Drag in aerodynamics

 Quote by munster Then all forces cancel out and there is no drag.
No. If the fluid were completely inviscid then this would be true, but unless you are flying/driving/moving through something like superfluid helium, you will have viscous drag.

 Quote by munster But in real life, flow separation always occurs due to the formation of a boundary layer that weakens as the flow goes over to the back.
This also isn't true. The formation of the boundary layer is required for separation to occur since it is, by definition, a boundary-layer phenomenon, but not all boundary layers separation. Far from it, actually. It all depends on the pressure gradient. Also, saying the boundary layer weakens really has no meaning. There is no such concept as boundary layer strength.

 Quote by munster The excess of frontal pressure over the weakened back pressure is what we call drag.
It is what we call form or pressure drag. It is hardly the only component of drag, though. For example, there is also viscous (skin friction) drag, lift-induced drag and wave drag.
P: 1,316
 Quote by munster in practice, skin friction drag is usually a very small component of total drag
This is not true. On, for example, a Boeing 737, the skin friction drag can account for 15% to 20% of total drag on the vehicle.

 Quote by munster boneh3ad is technically correct - perhaps I oversimplified and should have qualified my post. But the original question is essentially clarifying the impact of flow separation on drag and that impact is essentially on pressure drag.
 Quote by munster I omitted mention of these other kinds of drag to focus on pressure drag.
 Quote by munster The cancellation of front and back forces is what gave rise to D'Alembert's paradox - that there is no drag in inviscid flow while real flows do experience drag.
And this is all fine except you made some sweepingly general statements about drag as a whole, which, to the uninitiated such as the OP, would give the wrong idea, especially when mentioning D'Alembert's paradox which doesn't even hold for unseparated Stokes flow given the fact that viscosity exists.

 Quote by munster This adverse pressure gradient is inevitable for bodies because the body has to end at some point. The velocity in a boundary layer is already slow, especially near the surface, and an adverse pressure gradient causes it to slow down further (weaken?) to a point when the velocity reverses direction. Fluid is now flowing into the boundary layer between the surface and the boundary layer - and this is what is known as flow separation. As the original question was referring to vehicles and wings, there will always be flow separation at some point "behind". The fluid that fills the space left by the separated flow has less pressure than a flow that stayed attached - and the missing pressure is what causes pressure drag. So to restate what was meant about flow separation and the boundary layer: "... flow separation always occurs due to (the inevitable) formation of a boundary layer that weakens will inevitably encounter an adverse pressure gradient as the flow goes over the back"
I was with you right through the first sentence in this quote. Yes, on just about any two- or three-dimensional body, there will almost certainly need to be a pressure recovery region and there will be some degree of adverse pressure gradient. This, however, does not guarantee flow separation, and there are plenty of streamlined bodies that do not undergo flow separation at their design conditions. Shoot, in one of the wind tunnels I work in, we have such a model. Several, actually. Additionally, the same shape may get different results based on a laminar or turbulent boundary layer, as turbulent boundary layers are quite a bit more resistant adverse pressure gradients than laminar boundary layers. The bottom line is, over a streamlined body, the flow does not always separate.
P: 856
 Quote by boneh3ad This is not true. On, for example, a Boeing 737, the skin friction drag can account for 15% to 20% of total drag on the vehicle.
I would have thought it was higher than that, actually. I'm surprised it's that low (at least during high speed flight - at low speeds, the majority of the drag is induced drag of course).

 Related Discussions Classical Physics 7 Special & General Relativity 6 Mechanical Engineering 0 Aerospace Engineering 1 General Physics 0