What is the Polar Moment of Inertia and How is it Calculated?

In summary, the conversation focuses on finding the polar moment of area and moment of inertia for a hemicircle around the x-axis using the parallel axis theorem. The solution in the back of the book is missing a factor of a^4, and the calculations may be prone to errors if not done systematically. The correct formula for the polar moment of inertia for a semicircle can be found online, and it is important to use the centroid when applying the parallel axis theorem to ensure accurate results.
  • #1
member 392791

I know some of you may have given up on me understanding moment of inertia/second moment of area, but here is another problem. I am using the this table to get the equations for the polar moment of area of a hemicircle around the x-axis, then I am applying the parallel axis theorem to find the polar moment of inertia. The answer in the back of the book doesn't even have the term a in it, which is what I don't get.
 

Attachments

  • 7.58.pdf
    35.7 KB · Views: 236
  • table of inertias.pdf
    24.2 KB · Views: 232
  • 7.58 attempt 1.pdf
    197.3 KB · Views: 186
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You had calculated the correct location for the centroid of each of the semicircular cutouts (d = 2a - 4a/(3π)), but then you didn't use this value when you subtracted the polar moments of inertia from that of the square. You used 2a instead.

Try using the correct d and recalculate your answer.
 
  • #3
SteamKing said:
You had calculated the correct location for the centroid of each of the semicircular cutouts (d = 2a - 4a/(3π)), but then you didn't use this value when you subtracted the polar moments of inertia from that of the square. You used 2a instead.

Try using the correct d and recalculate your answer.

I'm not sure, but I think the OP also used the wrong formula for the area of the semicircle.
 
  • #4
The reason I didn't use the centroid was because I decided to use the formula as if I was considering the parallel axis at what would be point O in the "table of inertias'', so the distance from the centroid of the square to the edge of the semicircle is a distance 2a
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Chestermiller is right, and I checked into the polar moment of inertia for a semicircle. Your value is indeed about an axis coincident with the diameter and not the centroid of the semicircle.

Still, you need to correct your calculation of the polar moment for the figure, and then calculate the gyradius as requested by the problem statement.
 
  • #6
here is my attempt #2.

The back of the book says the moment of inertia is 25.1 in^4 and the radius of gyration is 1.606a. I don't see how the moment of inertia could be independent of a. Perhaps the solution is wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 7.58 attempt 2.pdf
    211.9 KB · Views: 176
  • #7
I would think so. I will check your calcs tomorrow (or today).
 
  • #8
My understanding is that the parallel axis theorem only works relative to the centroid. This is because of the distance squared times the area term. So, if as SteamKing says, the moment of inertia for the semicircle in the figure is about the origin, then you first have to use the parallel axis theorem to get it back to the centrioid, and then apply the parallel axis theorem again to get it to your specific axis of rotation. I hope this makes sense.

Chet
 
  • #9
Woopydalan said:
here is my attempt #2.

The back of the book says the moment of inertia is 25.1 in^4 and the radius of gyration is 1.606a. I don't see how the moment of inertia could be independent of a. Perhaps the solution is wrong?

I did my check calculation for the polar moment, and J = 25.1*a^4 in^4 and the radius of gyration = 1.606*a. It appears the book omitted the factor of a^4 in their answer for J.

NB for Woopydalan: I looked at your calcs, and there is something off with your calculation for J.
In my check calculations, because of symmetry for this problem, Ix = Iy, and because J = Ix + Iy, J = 2*Ix = 2*Iy. Therefore, I calculated Ix and used that to obtain J. You might like to try this approach as well.
 
  • #10
So what is wrong with my calculation for J?? Is it true what chestermiller said regarding the parallel axis theorem?

Edit: I found an equation online for the polar moment of inertia around the centroid of a semicircle
http://www.efunda.com/math/areas/circlehalf.cfm

and used that with the parallel axis theorem and got it..finally it's been like 2 days for one problem, except I don't know why I have to use centroids for the parallel axis theorem?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
I looked at your calculations (and there appears to be an arithmetic mistake in your final calculation of J), but there was something still I could not put my finger on. This is why I did a calculation of Ix, because it simplifies the use of the parallel axis theorem.

By calculating the moment of inertia about the x-axis, for example, the inertia of the two semicircles on the x-axis do not require the use of the parallel axis theorem: their inertia may be subtracted from the inertia of the square. The two semicircles on the y-axis will required the addition of A*d^2 to their inertias before subtraction from the inertia of the square.

It's easy in these calculations to make a mistake and not notice it. That's why it is advisable to set up a tabular form calculation so that the calculations are laid out in an orderly and regular fashion. Unfortunately, all of the textbooks I've seen do not show this approach, which is to the detriment of the student.
 

1. What is the polar moment of inertia?

The polar moment of inertia, also known as the second moment of area, is a measure of an object's resistance to rotational motion about an axis. It is calculated by summing the products of the area elements and their respective distances from the axis of rotation.

2. How is the polar moment of inertia different from the moment of inertia?

The polar moment of inertia is different from the moment of inertia in that it takes into account the distribution of mass around an axis of rotation, rather than just the distance of the mass from the axis. This makes it a more accurate measure for objects with rotational symmetry, such as cylinders or spheres.

3. What is the formula for calculating the polar moment of inertia?

The formula for calculating the polar moment of inertia depends on the object's shape and distribution of mass. For a solid cylinder with radius r, the formula is I = 0.5mr^2. For a hollow cylinder with inner radius r_1 and outer radius r_2, the formula is I = 0.5m(r_1^2 + r_2^2).

4. Why is the polar moment of inertia important in engineering and physics?

The polar moment of inertia is important in engineering and physics because it helps determine an object's rotational stability and resistance to bending or torsion. It is a crucial factor in designing structures and machines that can withstand rotational forces.

5. How does the polar moment of inertia affect an object's rotational motion?

The polar moment of inertia affects an object's rotational motion by determining the amount of torque needed to produce a certain amount of angular acceleration. Objects with a higher polar moment of inertia require more torque to rotate at the same speed as objects with a lower polar moment of inertia.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
634
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
544
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
460
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
957
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top