Queries on Damped Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
In Damped Harmonic Motion, the position function is expressed as x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ), leading to modified parameters A' and ω'. The question arises whether the maximum acceleration can be represented as (A')(ω')^2. The discussion indicates that this statement is not accurate, as differentiating the damped motion function results in a more complex expression involving both sine and cosine components. It is noted that for small damping, the acceleration can be approximated, but the original intuition about the maximum acceleration being represented by (A')(ω')^2 is confirmed to be incorrect.
LameGeek
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So we know that SHM can be described as:
x(t) = Acos(ωt + ϕ)
v(t) = -Aω sin(ωt + ϕ)
a(t) = -Aω^2 cos(ωt + ϕ)

it can be easily said that the max acceleration (in terms of magnitude) a SHM system can achieve is Aω^2

In Damped Harmonic Motion we know that:
x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ)

given that:
A' = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))
ω' = sqrt( (ω^2) - (b/2m)^2 )

Is it true that the max acceleration at any given time is (A')(ω')^2?

My intuition tells me that the above statement is not true =/
because differentiating the function x(t) = (A)(e^(-bt/2m))cos(ωt + ϕ) gives me a complex function (which has sine & cosine in it) & it doesn't really give me anything close to the (A')(ω')^2 term
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is easier using complex numbers.

For damped motion, ##x(t)## = the real part of ##Ae^{(-s + i\omega')t}## where ##s## is your ##b/2m##. Note, ##A## is a complex constant (to account for your phase angle ##\varphi##) and of course ##e^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta##.

So ##a(t)## = the real part of ##(-s + i\omega')^2 x(t)##

Your intuition is right, but if the damping is small, ##(-s + i\omega')^2## is close to ##-\omega^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I'm not really familiar with complex numbers (other than i^2 = -1) but your explanation does makes some sense to me. Thank You! =)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top