Wavelength of Light: Frequency & Photons Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Someone502
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Wavelength
AI Thread Summary
The wavelength of light is not the same as its frequency; rather, they are related through the equation v = fλ, where v is the speed of light, f is frequency, and λ is wavelength. Frequency refers to how many wave crests pass a point in one second, while wavelength is the distance between two crests. Light behaves both as a wave and as a particle, with photons representing the particle aspect. The energy of a photon is directly related to its frequency through the equation E = hν, where h is Planck's constant. Understanding these relationships clarifies that wavelength and frequency are distinct yet interconnected properties of light.
Someone502
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
is the wavelength of light the frequency that it sends out photons? i don't quite get it thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
For any wave, not just light:

v=f \lambda

where v is the speed of the wave (e.g. speed of light), f is the frequency and \lambda is the wavelength.

The frequency is the number of wave "crests" which pass a particular point in space per second. The wavelength is the distance between two "crests" of the wave. It is probably easiest to think about these quantities with something familiar, like water waves.

The wavelength of light is the distance between two maximum values of the electric (or magnetic) field making up the light wave. The frequency is the number of these field maxima which pass a point in space in a particular time.
 
Someone502 said:
is the wavelength of light the frequency that it sends out photons? i don't quite get it thanks
I think the question you are asking needs two equations.

c = \nu \lambda and E = h \nu

Light and all other elctromagnetic radiation can be explained in two forms: as a wave and as a particle.

As a wave, electromagnetic radiation (which includes radio waves, micro waves, infrared rays, visible light, ultra-violet light, x-rays and gamma rays) has a wavelength (denoted by Lambda) and a frequency (denoted by Nu). This relationship is what is represented by the first equation, above, (when c is the speed of light).

As a particle, electromagnetic radiation produces quanta (in the case of visible light these are known as photons). Each quantum has so much energy , which is related by the frequency of the quantum. This relationship is the second equation, above, (when h is Planck Constant).

So we can find out what the wavelength of light with a frequency of 4.5 x 1014 Hz is:

c = \nu \lambda

\Rightarrow 3.0 \times10^8 \ ms^{-1} = 4.5 \times 10^{14} \ Hz \ \times \ \lambda

\Rightarrow \lambda = \frac{3.0 \times10^8}{4.5 \times 10^{14}} = 6.67 \times 10^{-7} \ m

Alternatively, we can find out the energy that must be absorbed by an atom to produce a quantum with a frequency of 4.5 x 1014 Hz:

E = h \nu

\Rightarrow E = 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \ J Hz^{-1} \ \times \ 4.5 \times 10^{14} = 2.98 \times 10^{-19} \ J

So once 2.98 x 10-19 Joules of energy has been absorbed by an atom, the energy then released will produce a photon with a frequency of 4.5 x 1014 Hz.

What you must remember is that the two ideas of light are different: particles and waves. Each need a separate equation but they are both linked by the frequency of the wave/photon.

Your original question was (to me) saying that the wavelength of light is the same as the frequency. I hope you now see that it is related by not the same (value).

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top