Register to reply 
Bayesian/causal networks: just a fast check 
Share this thread: 
#1
May2614, 03:45 PM

P: 172

Hi!
I just want to check that I'm getting this right. Suppose we have a DAG for a Bayesian network: V S \ / \ / C Each variable is discrete and has two possible values, named v1 and v2 and similar for the others. We know the priors P(v) and P(s) and also the conditional on C, P(c1,v1,s1), P(c1,v1,s2)... Then [itex]P(v1c1)=\frac{P(c1,v1,s1)+P(c1,v1,s2)}{P(c1,v1,s1)+P(c1,v1,s2)+P(c1,v2 ,s1)+P(c1,v2,s2)}[/itex] And [itex]P(v1c1,s1)= P(c1,vs,s1)[/itex] Is that right? Also, is the fact that P(v1c1,s1) and P(v1c1,s2) are different mean that the conditional probabilities of V are not independent of its nondescendants? And therefore that is what makes this DAG not satisfy the Markov Assumption? Thank you for your time. 


#2
May2714, 01:01 PM

P: 140

Sorry, I am not knowledgeable in this area. Its been a while since you posted this, so I thought I'd respond even though I quite possibly won't be very helpful.
Your "diagram" V S \ / \ / C is unclear  did you mean V→C←S ? (you can't use spaces to format a diagram in many forums) I also don't know what P(c1,vs,s1) is. What does vs mean?? Finally, when you say that P(v1c1, s1) is different from P(v1c1,s2) do you mean logically (in the general case) or that you know P(s1) ≠ P(s2) [≠ 0.5 ] ? (yes, generally its different, but its actual value is indeterminate here.) The other problem that I have is that I don't understand your diagram (again, its probably my own ignorance). Lets say I am correct in assuming your diagram is V→C←S... (I hope we agree that a Markov Assumption is about future states.) Does this mean that V(t=i) influences C(t=i+1)? or that V(t=i) influences C(t=i) ? (where t is sequential time intervals) (I assume here that V and S are independent variables with some unknown T/F probability). Obviously, only if the past state(s) don't influence the future state(s) do we have a Markov Process. I hope I haven't totally wasted your time. If your diagram is timeless, then it says nothing about Markov Processes. If it is describing flow of states, then by definition any X→Y means Y is dependent on what X was, and hence isn't Markovian... I think? 


#3
May2814, 04:29 PM

P: 172

Thank you for your answer.
Yes, I meant V→C←S, I thought it was going to look as intended. With P(c1,vs,s1) I meant P(c1,v1,s1), its a typo (I can't edit it). I meant the joint probability of C = c1, V = v1 and S = s1. My diagram doesn't involve time its a causal network. The Markov Condition requires, according to my textbook (Neapolitan's Learning Bayesian Networks) 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Causal signals and causal system  Electrical Engineering  2  
2 bayesian networks  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  3  
Emergent relativity from causal networks  Beyond the Standard Model  23  
What Does Causal Really Mean in CDT (Causal Dynamical Triangulation) Quantum Gravity?  Beyond the Standard Model  1  
How Fast is the Electron Moving (Check My Work)  Introductory Physics Homework  2 