The formula pV=1/3Nm(c_rms)^2 in non cuboids

  • Thread starter Thread starter GeneralOJB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses whether the formula pV = (1/3)Nm(c_rms)^2 applies to non-cuboid containers. While traditional derivations use cuboidal shapes, alternative methods, such as a spherical container, suggest that the container's shape may not significantly impact the formula's validity. The key argument presented involves analyzing the momentum transfer from molecules colliding with a wall, which can be generalized without assuming a specific container shape. This approach is considered more robust and is supported by references to established texts like J H Jeans' "The Kinetic Theory of Gases." Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that the formula is applicable across various container geometries.
GeneralOJB
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Does pV = \dfrac 1 3 N m \left(c_{rms}\right)^2 apply in containers that aren't cuboids? The derivation I have seen uses a cuboid container so I'm not sure if or how this can be generalised.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An amusing 'derivation' uses a spherical container. It is very simple because it doesn't involve x, y and z components. Yet the factor of \frac{1}{3} enters in what seems like a quite different way from the way it enters in the cubical box method. So if you take the cubical and the spherical container methods together, you get quite a strong feeling that the shape of the box doesn't matter! But if you really want to be convinced, you need, imo, a more sophisticated approach...

Consider the molecules reaching a small 'patch', area A of wall in any shape of container. The rate at which they bring momentum normal to the wall up to the area A is given by
\frac{\Delta p_x}{\Delta t} = \frac{1}{2} A\ m\ \nu\ \overline{u_x^2}
Here x is the direction normal to the wall, \overline{u_x^2} is the mean square velocity component normal to the wall and \nu is the number of molecules per unit volume. It's easy to get from here to the formula you quote – without assuming any particular shape of container.

This derivation is much more satisfying than ones assuming particular shapes of container. It is to be found in J H Jeans: The Kinetic Theory of Gases and no doubt in many other texts. I reproduce a version of it in the thumbnails.
 

Attachments

  • Jeansmethod1.jpg
    Jeansmethod1.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 583
  • Jeansmethod2.jpg
    Jeansmethod2.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 539
Last edited:
GeneralOJB Are you any clearer?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top