Ratios & Fractions: Understanding the Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miraj Kayastha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions Ratios
AI Thread Summary
Ratios can be expressed as fractions because they represent a comparison between two quantities, allowing for a mathematical relationship to be established. For example, a ratio of 5:20 simplifies to 1:4, which can also be represented as the fraction 1/4, equating to 0.25. This decimal indicates that 25% of the total population consists of men in this scenario. The connection between ratios and fractions lies in their ability to convey the same proportional relationship in different formats. Understanding this relationship clarifies how ratios and fractions can express equivalent values.
Miraj Kayastha
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Why can ratios be written as fractions?

if there are 5 men in 20 people the ratio of men to total people is 5:20 which is 1:4.

But when we write 1/4 it gives 0.25. And 0.25 means the magnitude of each part when 1 is divided into 4 equal parts.

So how does ratio and fraction give a same meaning? Please explain it to me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you're asking. A ratio is defined, per Wiktionary, as

ratio (plural ratios)

1. A number representing a comparison between two things.
2. (arithmetic) The relative magnitudes of two quantities (usually expressed as a quotient).
3. (law) Short for ratio decidendi.

Clearly, the second definition is the best used here. If there are 5 men in 20 people, then we can say that on average, 0.25, or 25% of all people are men. That's just another way of saying 25 men for every 100 people, though, which is similar to the 5 in 20 example.

Sorry, I'm probably not making much sense, but the question is an odd one.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top