Calculating Laplace Transform of g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Laplace transform of the function g(t) = x(2t-5)u(2t-5), where the Laplace transform of x(t) is provided as X(s) = s / (2s^(2) + 1). Participants are exploring the implications of time shifting and frequency scaling in the context of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how to apply the given Laplace transform of x(t) to g(t), particularly regarding the effects of time shifting and the role of the unit step function. There are inquiries about the general forms of Laplace transforms for scaled and shifted functions, as well as the necessity of including the unit step function in the transformation process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the importance of the unit step function in determining the Laplace transform of g(t). Some have suggested setting up the integral for the Laplace transform directly to explore the solution further. There is a recognition of the need to understand the behavior of x(t) for t < 0 and how that relates to the transform of g(t).

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the unit step function and the behavior of x(t) for negative time, which may not have been fully covered in their coursework. There is an acknowledgment that the problem may require a more traditional approach if certain concepts have not yet been introduced in class.

mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is the question:

Assume that the Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s)=s / (2s^(2) + 1).
Determine the Laplace transform of the following function.

g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

How do I use the transform they have given me to solve this...I guess my major problem lies using time shifting and frequency scaling

Or if you have g(t)=t^2 sin(3t)x(t)...do you ignore x(t) since you usually ignore u(t) when it's at the end of the function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.
 
Galileo said:
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.


What happens to u(2t-5) though? Do you actually take the Laplace transform of that?
 
Last edited:
"u(2t-5)"

doesn't this refer to step functions
 
The u(2t-5) is necessary, because in the laplace transform of x(t) all information about x(t) for t<0 is lost. Since x(2t-5) is shifted to the right wrt x(t) you can't possibly know the laplace transform of x(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t). If you know x(t)=0 for t<0 then you can find the answer. That's what the unit step function does.
x(t)u(t) is just x(t) but zero for t<0. That's why you can take the lpalce transform of x(2t-5)u(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t).

If this hasn't been covered in class yet, you can just solve the problem the goold old way. Set up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and you'll see it all works out beautifully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K