Calculating Laplace Transform of g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

Click For Summary
To find the Laplace transform of g(t) = x(2t-5)u(2t-5), the relationship between time shifting and frequency scaling is crucial. The unit step function u(2t-5) is essential as it defines the behavior of g(t) for t < 0, ensuring that x(2t-5) is only considered for t ≥ 5/2. The Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s) = s / (2s^2 + 1), and the transformation of g(t) can be approached by setting up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and making appropriate variable changes. Understanding that x(t)u(t) effectively zeroes out x(t) for t < 0 aids in the calculation. Overall, applying these principles will yield the correct Laplace transform for g(t).
mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is the question:

Assume that the Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s)=s / (2s^(2) + 1).
Determine the Laplace transform of the following function.

g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

How do I use the transform they have given me to solve this...I guess my major problem lies using time shifting and frequency scaling

Or if you have g(t)=t^2 sin(3t)x(t)...do you ignore x(t) since you usually ignore u(t) when it's at the end of the function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.
 
Galileo said:
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.


What happens to u(2t-5) though? Do you actually take the Laplace transform of that?
 
Last edited:
"u(2t-5)"

doesn't this refer to step functions
 
The u(2t-5) is necessary, because in the laplace transform of x(t) all information about x(t) for t<0 is lost. Since x(2t-5) is shifted to the right wrt x(t) you can't possibly know the laplace transform of x(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t). If you know x(t)=0 for t<0 then you can find the answer. That's what the unit step function does.
x(t)u(t) is just x(t) but zero for t<0. That's why you can take the lpalce transform of x(2t-5)u(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t).

If this hasn't been covered in class yet, you can just solve the problem the goold old way. Set up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and you'll see it all works out beautifully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K