Calculating Laplace Transform of g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Laplace transform of the function g(t) = x(2t-5)u(2t-5), given that the Laplace transform of x(t) is X(s) = s / (2s² + 1). Key concepts include the use of time shifting and frequency scaling in Laplace transforms. The unit step function u(2t-5) is essential for determining the behavior of g(t) for t < 0, as it ensures that the transform only considers values where x(t) is defined. Participants emphasize setting up the integral for L(g(t))(s) to derive the solution effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with unit step functions and their role in signal processing
  • Knowledge of time shifting and frequency scaling in Laplace transforms
  • Ability to set up and evaluate integrals for Laplace transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Laplace transform, focusing on time shifting and frequency scaling
  • Learn how to apply the unit step function in Laplace transforms
  • Practice setting up integrals for various functions to compute their Laplace transforms
  • Explore examples of Laplace transforms involving piecewise functions and unit step functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with Laplace transforms, particularly those dealing with time-shifted signals and unit step functions.

mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is the question:

Assume that the Laplace transform of x(t) is given as X(s)=s / (2s^(2) + 1).
Determine the Laplace transform of the following function.

g(t)=x(2t-5)u(2t-5)

How do I use the transform they have given me to solve this...I guess my major problem lies using time shifting and frequency scaling

Or if you have g(t)=t^2 sin(3t)x(t)...do you ignore x(t) since you usually ignore u(t) when it's at the end of the function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.
 
Galileo said:
If you know the laplace transform of f(t), you how does the laplace transform of f(at) look? Or that of f(t-b)u(t-b)?

You can answer these questions generally, or you could setup the integral for the laplace transform of g(t) and make a change of variable.


What happens to u(2t-5) though? Do you actually take the Laplace transform of that?
 
Last edited:
"u(2t-5)"

doesn't this refer to step functions
 
The u(2t-5) is necessary, because in the laplace transform of x(t) all information about x(t) for t<0 is lost. Since x(2t-5) is shifted to the right wrt x(t) you can't possibly know the laplace transform of x(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t). If you know x(t)=0 for t<0 then you can find the answer. That's what the unit step function does.
x(t)u(t) is just x(t) but zero for t<0. That's why you can take the lpalce transform of x(2t-5)u(2t-5) in terms of that of x(t).

If this hasn't been covered in class yet, you can just solve the problem the goold old way. Set up the integral for L(g(t))(s) and you'll see it all works out beautifully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K