19th century matches: Chlorates without electrolysis?

In summary: Chlorates were used to make friction matches, and it's unclear if there was a better, non-electrolysis method of producing chlorates. However, combining "hot metal hydroxides" (presumably molten) with chlorine gas producing the chlorate is theoretically possible and may have been historically practical.
  • #1
JeffEvarts
74
7
First, I completely understand that electrolysis to produce chlorates is simple, practical, and inexpensive. I understand that electrolysis to produce chlorates was being used in the late 19th century. I'm wondering, given the (somewhat) limited distribution of electrical power at the time and the ubiquity of chlorates for the production of friction matches, if there was a practical non-electrolysis method of producing chlorates.

Wikipedia talks about combining "hot metal hydroxides" (presumably molten) with chlorine gas producing the chlorate. A balanced equation can be written:
6 KOH + 3 Cl2 = 3 H2O + 5 KCl + KClO3
But that doesn't mean it reacts that way. Indeed, the melting point of KOH is above the dissociation point of KClO3. :)

It appears that you could, theoretically, work your way up from hypochlorite, starting with chlorine gas dissolved in water, with lots of hydrogen chloride produced and discarded:
Cl2 + H2O
15px-Equilibrium.svg.png
HClO + HCl
3HClO + heat → HClO3 + 2 HCl
KOH + HClO3 → KClO3 + H2O
But again, just because you can write the equations doesn't mean the reaction will happen or that it's practical.

Anyway, I'm curious about how "all that perchlorate" was made back-in-the-day. If anyone has a pointer to a practical historical method, I'm all ears. My Google searches all seem to turn up the electrolysis route, to the exclusion of everything else.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
Calcium hypochlorite was manufactured commercially as a bleaching powder for most of the 19th century, and it's almost impossible to prevent disproportionation of hypochlorite to chlorate and chlorine; so if you're in the bleach business in those days, you're almost stuck with production of chlorate whether you want to be in the business or not. The chlorine can be run back through the lime vats to produce more hypochlorite, so it's not a loss, and there is/was a market for the chlorate.
 
  • #3
Thank you, bystander!

Reading up on bleaching powder, I see that excess chlorine beyond that required to neutralize the calcium hydroxide pushes things to a chloride/chlorate mixture, and that the two are difficult to separate. This process description addresses the problem of separating the chloride and the chlorate by the addition of potassium chloride, producing calcium chloride and potassium chlorate, which are then separated by fractional crystallization. This would certainly have been manageable and scalable historically.

Thanks again,
-Jeff
 
  • #4
Nurdrage, my favorite internet chemist, has this video on how to produce chlorate from bleach:


Eau de Javelle was produced since 1792 in Javel, now part of Paris, so it was available during the entire 19th century.
 
Last edited:
  • #5


Thank you for your question. I can provide some insight into the production of chlorates in the 19th century. It is true that electrolysis was the most commonly used method for producing chlorates during this time period. However, there were also non-electrolysis methods that were used, although they were not as widespread or efficient.

One method involved the reaction of hot metal hydroxides with chlorine gas, as mentioned in the Wikipedia article. This method does have some limitations, such as the high melting point of KOH and the potential for the reaction to not proceed as expected. However, it was still a viable option for producing chlorates.

Another method involved starting with hypochlorite and working up to chlorate. This method also had its challenges, such as the production of hydrogen chloride which needed to be removed. However, it was still a possible way to produce chlorates.

In terms of the practical historical methods for producing chlorates, there is limited information available. This is likely due to the fact that electrolysis became the dominant method and was more efficient and cost-effective. However, there may be some historical records or literature that describe other methods for producing chlorates.

In conclusion, while electrolysis was the most commonly used method for producing chlorates in the 19th century, there were also non-electrolysis methods that were used. Further research and investigation may uncover more information about these methods and their practicality.
 

1. How were 19th century matches made without electrolysis?

In the 19th century, matches were made using chlorates as the oxidizing agent instead of electrolysis. Chlorates are a type of salt that release oxygen when heated, making them effective for igniting a flame.

2. What materials were used to make these matches?

The main components of 19th century matches were potassium chlorate, sulfur, and antimony sulfide. The match head was made from a mixture of these materials, while the stick was usually made from wood treated with sulfuric acid to make it flammable.

3. Why were chlorates used instead of electrolysis for making matches?

Chlorates were used instead of electrolysis because they were cheaper and more accessible at the time. Electrolysis required electricity, which was not widely available at the time, while chlorates were readily available as a byproduct of salt mining.

4. Were there any risks associated with using chlorates in matches?

Yes, there were significant risks associated with using chlorates in matches. Chlorates are highly reactive and can easily ignite, making them a dangerous substance to handle. In addition, the resulting match head was also highly flammable, making it a safety hazard when not stored properly.

5. When did the use of chlorates in matches decline?

The use of chlorates in matches declined in the late 19th century when safer alternatives such as phosphorus and red phosphorus were discovered. These alternatives were less hazardous and more stable, making them a preferred choice for match production.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top