A Motorcyclist crossing a stretch of land

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a motorcyclist coasting over a stretch of land. Key calculations suggest that the distance traveled is approximately 2.2 meters, but there is debate about the role of friction in this scenario. Participants clarify that if the motorcyclist is free-wheeling without braking, they would maintain speed unless external forces act on them. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the difference between kinetic friction and rolling resistance in physics problems. Ultimately, the adequacy of the problem statement is questioned, with opinions on whether it reflects a proper understanding of the concepts involved.
Mioojo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A motorcyclist at a constant speed of 20 km/h with the motorcycle motor off. He tries to cross a 15 m Stretch of land with kinetic friction coefficient of 0.7 . Can he?
Relevant Equations
None given
TA = Ec

0,7*m*g*d = (m*v² /2)


1,4*g*d = (400/12,96)


14*d = (400/12,96)


d = 2,2 m

No
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

If the motorcyclist is free-wheeling (no braking force), why wouln't they just keep coasting at the same speed? Is there more to the problem statement?
 
  • Like
Likes Mioojo
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

If the motorcyclist is free-wheeling (no braking force), why wouln't they just keep coasting at the same speed? Is there more to the problem statement?
Thx.

The problem statement has all the information that was given to me. And I know that the answer to the problem is "No"
 
Mioojo said:
The problem statement has all the information that was given to me. And I know that the answer to the problem is "No"
As @berkeman hints, the correct answer is "Yes".

The coefficient of kinetic friction only comes into play if the brakes are applied hard enough that the tires skid. Most motorcyclists avoid applying the brakes when trying to coast and definitely try to avoid locking up both front and back tires at the same time.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
This is one of those tricky questions where you have to guess the expertise of the problem setter.
If the problem setter is properly qualified to be setting physics questions then, as others have noted, the kinetic friction information is irrelevant. All that need slow the motorcyclist is rolling resistance, which is typically a much lower value. But since you are not told a number for that, the correct answer is "not enough info".
However, if the problem setter is not so qualified, it may be a blunder, and the setter does not understand the difference between kinetic friction and rolling resistance.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, jbriggs444 and jim mcnamara
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top