- #1
dfj
- 3
- 0
A question on "the action as a function of the co-ordinates" in Landau 1
Landau Mechanics, volume 1, third edition, page 138-139 (section 43)
I can understand equations (43.1) - (43.3), which talk about treating the ending point of the path as a variable.
Then, they continue to treat the time of the ending point as a variable. In deriving equation (43.4), they said that
Here t is the time of the ending point of the path, while the positions of the starting point and ending point are fixed, and the time of the starting point is also fixed.
However, I don't understand why they say dS/dt = L can be derived from the definition of the action.
A simple counter-example would be like this:
Suppose
[tex]L=\frac{m}{2}{\dot{x}}^2[/tex]
Then, in treating the time of the ending point as a variable, we have
[tex]S(t) = \int_0^t Ldt'=\frac{m}{2t}{\Delta x}^2[/tex]
Here [tex]\Delta x=x_2-x_1[/tex].
Apparently, dS/dt is not equal to L.
Landau Mechanics, volume 1, third edition, page 138-139 (section 43)
I can understand equations (43.1) - (43.3), which talk about treating the ending point of the path as a variable.
Then, they continue to treat the time of the ending point as a variable. In deriving equation (43.4), they said that
From the definition of the action, its total time derivative along the path is
dS/dt=L.
Here t is the time of the ending point of the path, while the positions of the starting point and ending point are fixed, and the time of the starting point is also fixed.
However, I don't understand why they say dS/dt = L can be derived from the definition of the action.
A simple counter-example would be like this:
Suppose
[tex]L=\frac{m}{2}{\dot{x}}^2[/tex]
Then, in treating the time of the ending point as a variable, we have
[tex]S(t) = \int_0^t Ldt'=\frac{m}{2t}{\Delta x}^2[/tex]
Here [tex]\Delta x=x_2-x_1[/tex].
Apparently, dS/dt is not equal to L.