Are fossils really nonrenewable?

  • Thread starter WingZero
  • Start date
  • Tags
    fossils
In summary: Replenish rate does not really work. The rate at which we are using the world's oil is increasing, but it is not at an exponential rate. For instance, in 20 years, we have used oil at a rate that is 130,000 barrels per minute, but in 400 years, we might only use 60,000 barrels per minute. So, while it is correct to say that the rate of consumption is increasing, it is not correct to say that this rate is exponential.
  • #1
WingZero
17
0
are fossils really nonrenewable?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you mean "are the fossil fuels we use today essentially non-renewable" then the answer is yes.
The term "renewable" means the reasonable ability to be replenished.
For example, lumber, used both in construction and fuel source, is considered renewable given the relatively short amount of time needed to grow new trees.
 
  • #3
And that "amount of time" is the key. A person would be quite right to point out that new fossil fuels are being made all the time. After all, the process of fossilization did not stop when petroleum drilling started. However, every time you drive your car for one hour, you burn up many years worth (poss. thousands of years worth?) of stored photosynthetic energy. So the ratio of [rate of comnsumtion] to [rate of replenishment] (rC=rRx) renders the resource "nonrenewable".
 
  • #4
Questions about how much oil is left and how it should be used are a mix of politics and physics.

For example, our estimates of how much oil is left have been steadily increasing. Some say that's because we've developed better models for estimating the size of reserves; others accuse countries of inflating their numbers so that they'll be allowed to export more oil.

It also means that many of the numbers I googled for the purposes of this *rough* estimate are open for debate, opposition, refute. I don't trust anybody's numbers on this subject, not without a lot of study.

Anyway.

I averaged a few guesses to come up with one trillion barrels of oil left in the world. From another site, I found out we're using oil at a rate of 130,000 barrels per minute (yes, minute), and that this rate has been fairly constant for the past twenty years.

So let's say we our consumption rate was a quarter of what it is now for twenty years before that, and a twentieth of what it is now for forty years before that (for a very crude model of an exponential curve). That means we've burned 2 trillion barrels of oil so far.

So it took the Earth 4.5 billion years to make 3 trillion barrels of oil; that means that the Earth produces about 700 barrels of oil every year.

As long as we use less than 700 barrels of oil every year, we'll never run out of oil.

One barrel of oil can be refined to make 20 gallons of gasoline; one gallon of gas can be used to move a reasonably efficient car 40 miles on a flat surface.

So we won't use up the world's oil by driving our fuel-efficient cars 10,000 miles a year...

...as long as there are only 56 cars on the planet.

P
 
  • #5
BTW, Lurch:

The amount of oil used in driving a car for one hour works out to be very close to the amount of oil produced in an hour by the earth. (My ballpark figures gave me one and half hours for the replinishing time.) But the cost of driving half a billion autos for an hour...

P
 

1. What are fossils?

Fossils are the preserved remains or impressions of organisms that lived in the past. They can include bones, shells, footprints, and even imprints of soft tissue.

2. How are fossils formed?

Fossils are formed when an organism dies and is buried in sediment, such as mud or sand. Over time, the sediment hardens and preserves the remains of the organism. This process is known as fossilization.

3. Are fossils really nonrenewable?

Yes, fossils are considered nonrenewable resources. This means that once they are used up or destroyed, they cannot be replaced. Fossil formation takes millions of years and the conditions necessary for fossilization are not always present.

4. Can fossils be replaced or recreated?

No, fossils cannot be replaced or recreated. While scientists can make replicas or models of fossils, the actual fossil itself is unique and cannot be replicated or recreated.

5. Why are fossils important?

Fossils provide valuable evidence of past life on Earth. They help scientists understand the evolution of different species and the history of the planet. Fossils also provide clues about ancient environments and the processes that have shaped the Earth over time.

Similar threads

  • Earth Sciences
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
978
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
902
Back
Top