Are there any analogies that are actually meaninful?

  • Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date
In summary, humans are limited in their ability to visualize the universe because it is so large that we can't relate it to anything on Earth.
  • #1
MathJakob
161
5
Obviously most humans understand that the universe is incredibly large, so large that we can't even find an analogy that we can relate to. The problem is no two things we can visualize and comprehend can describe the relation of the size of Earth to the universe.

The closest one I found and I don't know if it's accurate but it was that 'The size of Earth compared to the size of the universe is the same as 1/180th the width of a hydroden atom compared to Earth

This still isn't meaninful as I don't think it's possible to visualize that.

Does anyone know any accurate analogies for things like the speed of light, the size of the universe, or even the milkyway, relative distances ect?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #3
Yeh I've seen those scale apps before and they're pretty cool. My favorite is http://scaleofuniverse.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi

I was after written analogies though.
 
  • #4
MathJakob said:
Yeh I've seen those scale apps before and they're pretty cool. My favorite is http://scaleofuniverse.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi

I was after written analogies though.

That URL you provided is considered a high-risk website for virus infection you should find an alternte or disable it in your post. You might want to run a scan of your machine as well.

EDIT: Sophos Web Protection flagged the site:
Code:
High Risk Website Blocked

    Location: searchresultsguide.com
    Access has been blocked as the threat Mal/HTMLGen-A has been found on this website.
    Return to the page you were previously viewing.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
jedishrfu said:
That URL you provided is considered a high-risk website for virus infection you should find an alternte or disable it in your post. You might want to run a scan of your machine as well.

Really? I've used the site many times before and it's been fine. That is strange... use this site then http://htwins.net/scale2/
 
  • #6
MathJakob said:
Really? I've used the site many times before and it's been fine. That is strange... use this site then http://htwins.net/scale2/

Thanks, I had posted that one in my earlier post but at least now I know you saw it.

I don't think you'll find an analogy of the universe's size to something on Earth since we don't know how big it is.

Hey maybe you could develop your own analogies and post them here. I think people respond well to analogies that limit the scale to within 100, 1000, or maybe 10,000. Any higher and it can't be easily imagined so you could use that range of 10,000 or less as a baseline.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
The problem with finding an analogy suitable for visualization is fundamentally a problem of extremes of magnitude. The diameter of the Earth is around 13,000 km. The diameter of the observable universe is on the order of 10^24 km. So you've got some 20 orders of magnitude difference between these two things. Humankind's sense of scale is informed by experience, which is limited by the human sensory system. What's the biggest thing you can reliably visualize, and what's the smallest? I think you'll find these things are at most a handful of orders of magnitude different, not 20.
 
  • #8
OP that's a great question.

In geology we often use analogy and it usually has little value. In fact it often provides a false understandings of time, size, quantity, etc.

'There are as many stars as there are grains of sand in the ocean'. No there isn't. Add or subtract a couple of zeros to the numbers of grains of sand and it would mean zilch to any of us. Nobody has a clue as to the number. We can't even fathom the amount of grains in bucket. We use mathematics. Usually the math is logical and expresses a number that is rational in describing some phenomenon. Being logical doesn't mean we relate to it.

I went to a lecture a couple decades a go and a prof purposely left a zero off of a large number. He mentioned it at the end of the lecture stating that the Universe has been reduced to a tenth of its size but nobody noticed. A tenth or a billionth it's size mean nothing to our limited physical senses and experience in the real world around us.
 

1. What is an analogy?

An analogy is a comparison between two things that are usually different, but have some similarities. It is used to help explain or illustrate a concept or idea.

2. How do analogies help in scientific research?

Analogies can be useful in scientific research because they can help scientists conceptualize complex ideas and theories. They can also aid in making predictions and formulating hypotheses.

3. Are all analogies in science accurate?

No, not all analogies in science are accurate. While they can be helpful, they should not be taken as literal representations of the concept being explained. It is important to critically evaluate analogies and their limitations.

4. Can analogies be used to simplify scientific concepts for non-scientific audiences?

Yes, analogies can be a useful tool for communicating complex scientific concepts to non-scientific audiences. They can help make the information more relatable and easier to understand.

5. Are there any limitations to using analogies in science?

Yes, there are limitations to using analogies in science. They can oversimplify complex ideas and may not be suitable for all audiences. Additionally, analogies may not be applicable to all aspects of a scientific concept, leading to misunderstandings or misconceptions.

Similar threads

Replies
58
Views
4K
  • Cosmology
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top