- #1
White_Wolf
- 10
- 1
I need endorsement in order to publish on arxiv but endorsers there do not answer e-mails. The group is gr-qc.
White_Wolf said:I need endorsement in order to publish on arxiv but endorsers there do not answer e-mails. The group is gr-qc.
Why does it matter if it's a stranger? Only the work should matter.Hornbein said:I wouldn't endorse a stranger. I wouldn't even agree to read their paper. Not that my endorsement would matter...
White_Wolf said:QUOTE="Hornbein, post: 5355949, member: 489043"]I wouldn't endorse a stranger. I wouldn't even agree to read their paper. Not that my endorsement would matter...
Welcome to real life.Why does it matter if it's a stranger? Only the work should matter.
Well it matters since some journals ask that the paper is pre-printed on arxiv.Choppy said:If the work matters it should be in a peer-reviewed journal.
Arxiv is a preprint server. It allows others in the community who follow your work to read what you're currently working on before it gets through the peer-review process. If no one is currently following your work, there really doesn't seem to be much point in putting it up on arxiv. (At least that's my point of view - putting work on arxiv isn't as popular in my field as it is in others.)
White_Wolf said:Well it matters since some journals ask that the paper is pre-printed on arxiv.
Me neither, but there are some journals that allow you to submit directly from the arXiv, instead of uploading the file to the journal's website, but that is only an option.f95toli said:but I've never come across a journal that stated that something HAD to be posted on the arXiv
A typical endorser would be asked to endorse about one person a year. The endorsement process is not peer review. You should know the person that you endorse or you should see the paper that the person intends to submit. We don't expect you to read the paper in detail, or verify that the work is correct, but you should check that the paper is appropriate for the subject area. You should not endorse the author if the author is unfamiliar with the basic facts of the field, or if the work is entirely disconnected with current work in the area.
f95toli said:Which journals? There are journals that won't allow you to post the manuscript on the arXiv until it has appeared in print (e.g. Nature); but I've never come across a journal that stated that something HAD to be posted on the arXiv, I did read about a new open-access journal that will actively use the arXiv but I don't think that is up and running yet.
atyy said:That is not true. Nature does allow you to post it on the arXiv before it has appeared in print.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7031/full/434257b.html
"So please let's put a myth about this journal to rest. As first stated in an editorial in 1997, and since then in our Guide to Authors, if scientists wish to display drafts of their research papers on an established preprint server before or during submission to Nature or any Nature journal, that's fine by us."
You don't want to endorse things that have a low quality - if you know the author from previous work this is often not an issue, but how do you tell if the work from a stranger has some reasonable quality? You have to read it, which takes time. The average quality of work from authors who do not know anyone working in the relevant field is very low.White_Wolf said:Why does it matter if it's a stranger? Only the work should matter.
White_Wolf said:Well it matters since some journals ask that the paper is pre-printed on arxiv.
It tells me they are lazy since they didn't refuse to endorse as you've said (and I didn't) they just ignored.Vanadium 50 said:This is what it says under "What are my responsibilities as an endorser?"
you can look at the paper and use your brain to conclude without needing to have a freaking relationship with the author.mfb said:You don't want to endorse things that have a low quality - if you know the author from previous work this is often not an issue, but how do you tell if the work from a stranger has some reasonable quality? You have to read it, which takes time. The average quality of work from authors who do not know anyone working in the relevant field is very low.
There is something fishy in people calling them selves scientists and yet not knowing a thing about science. Buying their diploma and then runing around twiter and tv being all p.c. while their manuscripts have 5 to 7 pages and 50 to 70 references, nothing new, no inovative thinking, just repeating the same over and over.ZapperZ said:This is absolutely false. In fact, many journals PREFER that you do not upload it to arxiv prior to publication! Some even prohibit such uploads.
There is something fishy about all this.
Zz.
White_Wolf said:There is something fishy in people calling them selves scientists and yet not knowing a thing about science. Buying their diploma and then runing around twiter and tv being all p.c. while their manuscripts have 5 to 7 pages and 50 to 70 references, nothing new, no inovative thinking, just repeating the same over and over.
You can look at the paper, but this takes time. If the probability of getting a good manuscript is negligible, why would you want to invest the time?White_Wolf said:you can look at the paper and use your brain to conclude without needing to have a freaking relationship with the author.
Exactly.ZapperZ said:This, by itself, shows your own ignorance about scientific papers and what scientists do, and inditectly reflects on the quality of your "work".
The purpose of "Arxiv Endorsement for Gr-qc Group" is to request support for publishing a research paper related to general relativity and quantum cosmology on the Arxiv platform. This endorsement serves as a recommendation from the Gr-qc Group, which is a moderated email discussion group for these topics.
Anyone who is a member of the Gr-qc Group and has a research paper related to general relativity and quantum cosmology can request support for publishing through "Arxiv Endorsement for Gr-qc Group".
To request support, you will need to submit a request to the moderators of the Gr-qc Group. This request should include the title and abstract of your research paper, as well as a brief explanation of why you are seeking endorsement from the group.
No, there is no fee for requesting support through "Arxiv Endorsement for Gr-qc Group". This service is provided by the Gr-qc Group and Arxiv as a way to promote and share research related to general relativity and quantum cosmology.
The length of time it takes to receive an endorsement can vary, as it depends on the availability and response time of the moderators. It is recommended to submit your request at least a few weeks before your desired publication date to allow for enough time to receive an endorsement.