Axiomatization of quantum mechanics and physics in general ?

In summary, formal proofs are a way of proving a mathematical statement, while non-formal proofs are proofs that are not done in a formal way.
  • #211
atyy said:
Where did you learn to derive CHSH?

Originally a combination of an introduction to Bell's theorem by Travis Norsen [arXiv:0707.0401 [quant-ph]], one of Bell's explanations ["The theory of local Beables"], and just sitting down and working it out. I'd read both Bell's original 1964 article the 1969 CHSH article before that but didn't find the reasoning quite as clear.

Deriving the local bound on a given linear Bell correlator isn't really an issue though. Like you pointed out earlier in post #192, it's sufficient to consider deterministic models. You can always work out the local bound on a linear Bell correlator just by maximising it over the set of local deterministic strategies (i.e., deterministic ways of mapping inputs ##x## and ##y## to outputs ##a_{x}## and ##b_{y}##), and there are a finite number of these (e.g., there are sixteen in the situation that the CHSH correlator applies to).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
739
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
619
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
113
Views
6K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
80
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top