Calculating Stopping Distance of Car: Formula & Var. Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter laneschmidt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stopping distance of a car using two different formulas. The initial attempt to calculate the stopping distance resulted in an incorrect answer due to not accounting for the negative acceleration during deceleration. The correct stopping distance was determined using an average velocity formula, yielding the right answer. The confusion arose from not knowing when to apply each formula correctly, highlighting the importance of recognizing acceleration direction. Properly applying the negative sign for deceleration is crucial for accurate calculations.
laneschmidt
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
This is a classic case of using the wrong formula for the question. My problem is that, using the given information, both formulas could've been used (to the best of my knowledge)

1. Homework Statement
A car traveling at 22.4 m/s comes to a stop in 2.55 s. Determine the stopping distance of the car, assuming that acceleration is uniform.

Homework Equations


Let d=displacement
d=Vi*t+0.5at2
d=(Vi+Vf)/2t
a=∆v/t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


1. I determined that the rate of acceleration was 8.78 m/s^2→ 22.4 m/s/2.55 s = 8.78 m/s2
2. I had all the variables needed so I used the above equation:
d=(22.4 m/s)(2.55 s) + 0.5(8.78 m/s2)(2.55)2
d=85.7 m (wrong answer)

3. After some confusion I decided to try another equation, the latter equation above:
d=(22.4 m/s + 0 m/s)/2(2.55 s)
d=28.6 m (right answer)[/B]

This confuses me. Clearly I do not know when to use each equation, even when both could be used with respect to the variables given. Some insight on this would be appreciated! Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first method is correct if you use the correct (negative) sign for the acceleration.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes laneschmidt
Thanks Chet! I overlooked the fact that the car was decelerating.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top