Calculating the mass of a beam of non uniform density.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a beam with non-uniform density, defined by the equation ρ = ρ₀e^(αx). The beam's dimensions are specified, and the user attempts to derive the total mass using integration. A crucial point raised is the presence of a minus sign in the calculations, which was identified as a typo. The final mass calculated is approximately 6.83 kg, and the importance of maintaining clarity in algebraic steps to avoid errors is emphasized. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in physics.
Craptola
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Been doing some physics problems from my mechanics class. This is the first time I've attempted a problem like this and am not so confident with solving it, I could be correct and just being paranoid but I just have a feeling I've made a mistake somewhere, would appreciate if someone who is comfortable with this kind of thing would tell me if/where I'm going wrong.

Homework Statement


Consider a thin beam of length L=3 m, and height and width equal to w= 2 cm and h=2 cm respectively. Assume that the composure of the beam is from a mixture of materials, that have given it a non-uniform mass density, which varies continuously along x [where x represents the coordinate for the direction along the length of the beam, measured from the left edge of the beam]. Assume that such mass density as a function of x is given by:
\rho = \rho _{0}e^{\alpha x}
where ρo= 9.10^3 kg/m3 and α=1/L
Find the total mass for the beam.

Homework Equations



M=\int_{0}^{3}dm

dm=\rho dv

The Attempt at a Solution



dv=0.0004dx
\therefore dm=0.0004\rho dx = 3.6e^{-\frac{1}{3}x}dx
M=\int_{0}^{3}dm = 3.6\int_{0}^{3}e^{-\frac{1}{3}x}dx
= -10.8\left ( e^{-1} - 1 \right ) = 6.83kg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Craptola said:
dv=0.0004dx
It is a good idea to work with the algebra until you have the final formula and only then substitute in the values of the known constants. You're less likely to make a mistake, it's easier to spot where a mistake has been made (e.g. by considering dimensionality) and it's easier for others to follow.
\therefore dm=0.0004\rho dx = 3.6e^{-\frac{1}{3}x}dx
Where did the minus sign come from? Did you omit that in the formula for density?

Otherwise, looks fine.
 
haruspex said:
Where did the minus sign come from? Did you omit that in the formula for density?

Yeah, that's a typo, thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top