- #1
K29
- 108
- 0
Homework Statement
This question has been literally troubling me for 2 days.
Question 2(b)
Suppose for some [tex]c \in R, 0<c<1,[/tex] we have [tex]|a_{n+1}-L|<c|a_{n}-L|[/tex] for [tex]\forall n \in N [/tex] (1)
Use the sandwich theorem and the fact that[tex]\stackrel{lim}{_{n\rightarrow\infty}} c^{n}=0[/tex] to prove that
[tex]\stackrel{lim}{_{n \rightarrow \infty}}a_{n}=L[/tex]
Note: I also know and have proven in questions 2(a) that:
[tex]|a_{n}-L| \leq c^{n} |a_{0} - L| \forall n \in N[/tex](2)
Note:[tex] a_{n} [/tex] is an element of the sequence [tex](a_{n})[/tex]
Homework Equations
Definition of a limit:
[tex]\forall n \in N, \forall \epsilon > 0, \exists K_{ \epsilon} \in R, n \ge K_{\epsilon}[/tex] such that [tex]|a_{n}-L|< \epsilon[/tex]
Sandwich theorem:
[tex]a_{n} \leq b_{n} \leq c_{n}, \stackrel{lim}{_{n \rightarrow \infty}}a_{n} = \stackrel{lim}{_{n \rightarrow \infty}}c_{n}=L \Rightarrow \stackrel{lim}{_{n \rightarrow \infty}}b_{n}=L[/tex]
The Attempt at a Solution
for the sandwich theorem I could have [tex] b_{n} =c^{n} a_{n}[/tex]. This is less than [tex]a_{n}[/tex] since c is between zero and one. However the limit of this is 0(which is also under the assumption that the limit of [tex]a_{n}[/tex] exists, which we are trying to prove. So starting off with sandwich theorem basics doesn't really help me because I also can't think of any [tex]c_{n} \geq a_{n}[/tex].
The next thing I tried is considering the statements in the problem.
[tex]|a_{n}-L| \leq c^{n} |a_{0} - L|[/tex] could have been useful. But it doesn't imply anything about the sequence and its limits. I.E. I can't assume that this implies that [tex]a_{n} \leq c^{n}a_{0}[/tex]
I can't really apply the definition of a limit to anything. By making the assumption that any of the equations above are less than some[tex]\epsilon[/tex] almost automatically gives the result that the limit for [tex]a_{n}[/tex] is L. i.e assuming the right hand side of equation (2) is less than some epsilon for [tex]\forall n>K[/tex]means[tex]|a_{n}-L|<\epsilon[/tex] holds true as well.
Well it would almost hold true. But without knowing the details of [tex]a_{n}[/tex] I caan't prove it to be true. I.E I can't construct a [tex]K_{\epsilon}[/tex] unless I know more about [tex]a_{n}[/tex]
PLEASE help on this one. I've been struggling for ages. Thanks
Last edited: