Can we prove that (m+1)/(n+1) > m/n if n>m>0 using synthetic proof?

In summary, we can prove that if n>m>0, then (m+1)/(n+1) > m/n by showing that n>m implies (m+1)/(n+1) > m/n. This can be done by manipulating the inequality and using the fact that n and n+1 are positive numbers. Alternatively, working backward from the conclusion to the hypothesis, we can also prove this statement. This is called a "synthetic proof".
  • #1
EqualElement
4
0
Let m,n be real numbers. Prove that if n>m>0 , then (m+1)/(n+1) > m/n
I'm currently confuse in this one help will be very much needed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How are you confused?
 
  • #3
Cbarker1 said:
How are you confused?
I understand the question but don't really know how to prove it.
 
  • #4
Let's start with several examples. What do you choose for n and m which m must be bigger than n and be positive for both (m and n)?
 

Attachments

  • mhb_quotebreak.png
    mhb_quotebreak.png
    8.8 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
  • #5
okay m=1 , n=2 would make it true.
 
  • #6
Any other example? Just keep making examples to see a pattern...
 
  • #7
m=2, n=3
m=3, n =4
m=12, n=69.
 
  • #8
let us calculate $\frac{m+1}{n+1}- \frac{m}{n}$
= $\frac{n(m+1) - m(n+1)}{m(n+1)}$
= $\frac{n - m}{m(n+1)}$
as n > m >0 so both numerator and denominator positive and hence

$\frac{m+1}{n+1}- \frac{m}{n}> 0$

or $\frac{m+1}{n+1}> \frac{m}{n}$
 
  • #9
Since m and n are positive numbers, so are n and n+ 1 so you can eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by n and n+ 1 without changing the inequality.. That gives you n(m+1)> m(n+1) so that nm+ n> mn+ m. Can you finish?
 
  • #10
What I showed above was that "if $\frac{m+1}{n+1}> \frac{m}{m}$ then n> m. What you want to prove is the other way around- just reverse every step. From n> m, mn+ n> mn+ m.
n(m+1)> m(n+ 1). Dividing both sides by the positive number n and n+ 1, $\frac{m+1}{n+1}> \frac{m}{n}$.

It is often useful to see how to prove something by working backward, from the conclusion to the hypothesis. As long as every step is "reversible", it isn't necessary to actually show the reverse. That is called "synthetic proof".
 

1. What is a synthetic proof?

A synthetic proof is a method of mathematical proof that uses basic axioms, definitions, and logical deductions to prove a statement or theorem. It does not rely on any previous theorems or knowledge.

2. Can we prove that (m+1)/(n+1) > m/n if n>m>0 using synthetic proof?

Yes, it is possible to prove this statement using synthetic proof. In fact, this statement is known as the Archimedes' Axiom and is commonly used in synthetic proofs.

3. How does synthetic proof differ from other types of mathematical proof?

Synthetic proof differs from other types of mathematical proof, such as analytic proof or geometric proof, in that it relies solely on basic axioms and logical deductions rather than previous theorems or specific properties of geometric figures.

4. What are the advantages of using synthetic proof?

The main advantage of synthetic proof is that it provides a more intuitive and visual understanding of a mathematical statement or theorem. It also allows for the discovery of new theorems and properties without relying on previous knowledge.

5. Are there any limitations to using synthetic proof?

One limitation of synthetic proof is that it can be more difficult to construct and may require more steps compared to other types of proofs. It also may not be applicable to all mathematical statements or theorems, as some may require more advanced techniques or knowledge.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
350
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
867
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
522
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
580
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
395
Back
Top