Classicality in Bell's original reasoning

In summary, the assumption of classicality is made when trying to explain the results of measurements that show perfect correlations. This so called "classicality" is inferred (not assumed) from locality and prediction of perfect correlations.
  • #106
Closed pending moderation

Edit: after discussion we have decided to leave this thread closed
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
    • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
80
Views
4K
A Did rotating polarizer show violations of Bell's Inequality?
    • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
I Contextuality, Complementarity, Signaling, and Bell tests
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
0
Views
760
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
    • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
93
Views
5K
A Can entanglement be detected in a single Bell pair?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
840
A Does the Bell theorem assume reality?
    • Quantum Physics
7
Replies
220
Views
18K
B The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
I An Alternative form of Bell's Inequality
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
55
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top