Conformal flatness of Riemannian manifolds

  • A
  • Thread starter RockyMarciano
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Manifolds
In summary, manifolds of constant curvature are conformally flat, but for manifolds of dimension greater than 2, it is not necessarily true that non-constant curvature implies non-conformally flat. In 2 dimensions, all manifolds are locally conformally flat, while in 3 dimensions, the Cotton tensor must vanish for a manifold to be locally conformally flat. In 4 dimensions and higher, the Weyl tensor must vanish for a manifold to be locally conformally flat. However, globally conformally flat manifolds can exist in negative constant curvature cases, such as in hyperbolic space, as it is homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n##. The curvature can remain
  • #1
RockyMarciano
588
43
Manifolds of contant curvature are conformally flat. I'm trying to find a stronger claim related to this for manifolds of dimension >2. Does anyone knows if for instance Riemannian manifolds(of dimension >2) with non-constant curvature are necessarily not conformally flat, or maybe something weaker, can it be said just for dimension n=3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Conformally flat manifolds always have a metric tensor of the form

$$ds^2 = e^{2\varphi} (\delta_{ab} \, dx^a \, dx^b)$$
So from that you can learn all the necessary facts about the curvature. It should be easy for you to compute all the curvatures. It shouldn't be hard for you to show the following:

1. In 2d, all manifolds are (locally) conformally flat.
2. In 3d, a manifold is (locally) conformally flat if and only if the Cotton tensor vanishes.
3. In 4d and higher, a manifold is (locally) conformally flat if and only if the Weyl tensor vanishes.

(In 3d, the Weyl tensor vanishes identically).
 
  • #3
Ben Niehoff said:
Conformally flat manifolds always have a metric tensor of the form

$$ds^2 = e^{2\varphi} (\delta_{ab} \, dx^a \, dx^b)$$
So from that you can learn all the necessary facts about the curvature. It should be easy for you to compute all the curvatures. It shouldn't be hard for you to show the following:

1. In 2d, all manifolds are (locally) conformally flat.
2. In 3d, a manifold is (locally) conformally flat if and only if the Cotton tensor vanishes.
3. In 4d and higher, a manifold is (locally) conformally flat if and only if the Weyl tensor vanishes.

(In 3d, the Weyl tensor vanishes identically).
Thanks, I did gather this much from the WP page. I'm only considering the case where the function ##\varphi## is defined for te whole manifold, not just locally. Could you perhaps give me a counterexample either in three or more dimensions in which a non-constant curvature Riemannian manifold is conformally flat? Perhaps there is some obvious counterexample, checking the infinite possible non-constant curvatures looks like a daunting task.
 
  • #4
If you want it to be globally conformally flat, then your constant-curvature assumption doesn't work in the first place. A sphere has constant curvature, but is not conformally flat.

In general, any manifold with positive curvature will probably be closed (there are theorems that involve more specific criteria, I think), so they can't be conformally flat. However, negative-curvature manifolds can generally avoid being closed.

So, I recommend doing the following: Take the ansatz I wrote for a conformally-flat metric, and work out its curvatures in terms of the function ##\varphi##. The Ricci scalar will be related to the Laplacian of ##\varphi##, for example. Next, just choose ##\varphi## to be any smooth function such that the curvature remains negative. You will get a smooth manifold which is probably homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n## (you may need to check for any non-trivial topology, but I think generically you won't have it). And then you'll have a non-constant-curvature manifold which is conformally flat.
 
  • Like
Likes RockyMarciano
  • #5
Ben Niehoff said:
If you want it to be globally conformally flat, then your constant-curvature assumption doesn't work in the first place. A sphere has constant curvature, but is not conformally flat.
Oops, my bad, you are right. But at least in the negative constant curvature case of hyperbolic space, it is not only locally conformally flat but also globally, then? (since there is no topologic obstruction, i.e. it is homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n##)
In general, any manifold with positive curvature will probably be closed (there are theorems that involve more specific criteria, I think), so they can't be conformally flat. However, negative-curvature manifolds can generally avoid being closed.

So, I recommend doing the following: Take the ansatz I wrote for a conformally-flat metric, and work out its curvatures in terms of the function ##\varphi##. The Ricci scalar will be related to the Laplacian of ##\varphi##, for example. Next, just choose ##\varphi## to be any smooth function such that the curvature remains negative. You will get a smooth manifold which is probably homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n## (you may need to check for any non-trivial topology, but I think generically you won't have it). And then you'll have a non-constant-curvature manifold which is conformally flat.
Ok. Thanks. I take it you mean that the curvature remains nonpositive?
 
  • #6
RockyMarciano said:
Oops, my bad, you are right. But at least in the negative constant curvature case of hyperbolic space, it is not only locally conformally flat but also globally, then? (since there is no topologic obstruction, i.e. it is homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n##)

Yes.

Ok. Thanks. I take it you mean that the curvature remains nonpositive?

Yes, and in fact the curvature can be positive sometimes (just not everywhere). What you really need to do is check topological invariants such as the Euler number. As long as the manifold is homeomorphic to ##\mathbb{R}^n##, then you're fine. But the condition is going to be that the integrals of some quantities (built out of the curvature) over the whole manifold need to have certain values. This can be quite permissive in terms of what can happen locally.
 

1. What is the definition of conformal flatness?

Conformal flatness is a property of a Riemannian manifold, which means that the metric tensor on the manifold can be locally transformed into a constant multiple of the Euclidean metric tensor through a conformal transformation.

2. How is conformal flatness different from intrinsic flatness?

Conformal flatness is a stronger condition than intrinsic flatness, as it requires the metric tensor to be transformed into a constant multiple of the Euclidean metric tensor through a conformal transformation, while intrinsic flatness only requires the metric tensor to be locally isometric to the Euclidean metric tensor.

3. What are the consequences of a Riemannian manifold being conformally flat?

Conformal flatness has several important consequences, such as simplifying the calculation of geodesics, making it easier to define and compute curvature, and allowing for the use of conformal invariants in studying the manifold.

4. Can a Riemannian manifold be conformally flat and have non-zero curvature?

Yes, a Riemannian manifold can be conformally flat and still have non-zero curvature. Conformal flatness only guarantees that the metric tensor can be transformed into a constant multiple of the Euclidean metric tensor, but does not necessarily mean that the curvature is zero.

5. How is conformal flatness related to conformal symmetry?

Conformal flatness is closely related to conformal symmetry, as both involve conformal transformations. However, conformal flatness only requires the metric tensor to be transformed into a constant multiple of the Euclidean metric tensor, while conformal symmetry requires the metric tensor to be transformed into itself.

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
8K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
5
Replies
156
Views
23K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top