- #1
Vaxjo
- 13
- 2
- TL;DR Summary
- Let us compare the fundamental notions of quantum physics - contextuality vs. incompatibility.
The natural question arises: What is contextuality without incompatibility? (What is ``dry-residue''?)
see https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-020-04666-z
I think that contextuality is just another word for incompatibility. I asked may people: Point out to the dry-residue of contextuality, filtered of incompatibility. All these bright people were not able to say anything sensible on this issue. They continue to highlight contextuality as some distinguishing feature of quantum physics.
P.S. I speak about quantum physics, quantum observables, not mathematics with generalized probability models.
I would be happy to receive some input on this issue.
Yours, Andrei Khrennikov
I think that contextuality is just another word for incompatibility. I asked may people: Point out to the dry-residue of contextuality, filtered of incompatibility. All these bright people were not able to say anything sensible on this issue. They continue to highlight contextuality as some distinguishing feature of quantum physics.
P.S. I speak about quantum physics, quantum observables, not mathematics with generalized probability models.
I would be happy to receive some input on this issue.
Yours, Andrei Khrennikov