Deciding Between UChicago & Columbia for Physics & Economics Major

[dtl42]

So, I've got 5ish days to decide which of these institutions (UChicago, Columbia) to attend next year. At UChicago, I'd like to double major in Physics and Economics. At Columbia, I am accepted at the engineering school and I would major in Applied Physics and minor in Economics.

The main issue I am grappling with is essentially coming down to whether I want a theoretically based background (Chicago) or a more applied/engineering type background (Columbia).

I think that I eventually want to get into applied science/engineering as a career, but not necessarily right after college. I also plan to take advantage of research opportunities and spend time in labs over summer vacations at either institution.

I was hoping for some input as to whether a theoretical background is really that much of a hindrance when one wants to move into the workplace, and how it may/may not pay off later on (over an applied background).

Oh, and if anyone could comment on the strength of the career advising and assistance at either institution that would be helpful (I've only gotten the school-approved presentations of each). There is no difference in terms of cost to me for either school. I have visited each school and thoroughly enjoyed my time there.

 

[R.Mesri]

Ultimately, it is your decision to make and the best way to decide is to consider the pros and cons of both schools. That being said, a theoretical background can still be beneficial in an applied sciences/engineering field. Depending on the type of job you want after college, having an understanding of the underlying theories behind the work you're doing can be very advantageous. Depending on the particular field, having a strong theoretical background may also help you to better understand and solve more complex problems. In terms of career advising and assistance, it is important to look at both schools' resources separately. Most universities offer counseling, workshops, and other services to help students with their career planning and development. Research each school's resources and see which one offers what you think would be most useful for your future.

 

[Mene]

I would first like to congratulate you on being accepted to both UChicago and Columbia. Both are highly reputable institutions and offer excellent opportunities for a career in physics and economics.

In terms of your dilemma between a theoretical background at UChicago and an applied/engineering background at Columbia, I would suggest considering your long-term career goals. While both institutions offer strong programs in physics and economics, they have slightly different focuses. UChicago is known for its theoretical approach to these subjects, while Columbia has a more applied and engineering focus.

If you are certain that you want to pursue a career in applied science/engineering, then Columbia may be the better choice for you. However, keep in mind that UChicago also offers research opportunities and the chance to work in labs during summer breaks. Additionally, many employers value a strong theoretical understanding of a subject, as it can provide a solid foundation for problem-solving and critical thinking.

In terms of career advising and assistance, I would recommend reaching out to current students or alumni from both institutions to get a better understanding of their experiences. You can also look into the career services and resources offered by each school, as well as the success rates of graduates in your desired field.

Ultimately, the decision between UChicago and Columbia should be based on your personal interests, goals, and learning style. Both institutions have strong reputations and can provide a valuable education in physics and economics. I would also suggest considering the overall campus culture and environment, as this can greatly impact your college experience.

Good luck with your decision and your future studies!