Derivative of a fractional function without quotient rule

In summary: Choice 2 or Choice 3 would be the best way to go. Choice 2 would be: ##x(t) = (2t - 5) (4t^2 + 2t)^{-1}## Choice 3 would be: ##x(t) = (2t - 5) \left(\frac{1}{4t^2+2t}\right)##
  • #1
Saracen Rue
150
10

Homework Statement


The displacement of a particle can be modeled by the function [itex]x(t)=\frac{2x-5}{4x^2+2x}[/itex], where [itex]t[/itex] is in seconds, [itex]x[/itex] is in meters, and [itex]t ∈ [1,10][/itex]

a) Determine the derivative of the function without using the quotient rule.

b) Hence, find exactly when the particle is stationary.

c) Determine when the particle is moving at a constant velocity. You can use your calculator to assist you.


d) A jolt is defined as being a change in acceleration over time. With the help of your calculator, determine the time for which the jolt is equal to the displacement.

Homework Equations


I'm not sure, besides the differentiation rules. However, I can't use the quotient rule.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm honestly not sure how to even begin here. I've never been taught how to solve this sort of question without the quotient rule. Can anyone please give me an idea on where I should start? Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Saracen Rue said:
Can anyone please give me an idea on where I should start?
Use the product rule and the chain rule instead?
 
  • #3
Krylov said:
Use the product rule and the chain rule instead?
I have never learned the chain rule method. Also, I'm not sure how the product rule would work here: the [itex](4x^2+2x)[/itex] term would be to the power of negative 1, and I'm not sure how to apply to product rule then. Sorry for being stupid, but I'm really new (not to mention bad) when it comes to calculus...
 
  • #4
Saracen Rue said:
Sorry for being stupid, but I'm really new (not to mention bad) when it comes to calculus...
Lack of knowledge does not imply stupidity. Do you have a good calculus book? I recommend that you make a few hundred exercises from such a book (not all at once!) differentiating all kinds of functions using the chain rule, product rule and quotient rule. This is essential material and it should not be an obstruction.

Also, now that I take a better look, I think your function should read ##x(t) = \frac{2 t - 5}{4 t^2 + 2 t}## instead, so ##t## instead of ##x## in the right-hand side.
 
  • #5
[QUpOTE="Saracen Rue, post: 5283378, member: 521193"]

Homework Statement


The displacement of a particle can be modeled by the function [itex]x(t)=\frac{2x-5}{4x^2+2x}[/itex], where [itex]t[/itex] is in seconds, [itex]x[/itex] is in meters, and [itex]t ∈ [1,10][/itex]

a) Determine the derivative of the function without using the quotient rule.

b) Hence, find exactly when the particle is stationary.

c) Determine when the particle is moving at a constant velocity. You can use your calculator to assist you.


d) A jolt is defined as being a change in acceleration over time. With the help of your calculator, determine the time for which the jolt is equal to the displacement.

Homework Equations


I'm not sure, besides the differentiation rules. However, I can't use the quotient rule.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm honestly not sure how to even begin here. I've never been taught how to solve this sort of question without the quotient rule. Can anyone please give me an idea on where I should start? Thank you for your time.[/QUOTE]

The product rule gives
[tex] \frac{d}{dx} (2x-5)(4x^2 +2x)^{-1} = \left[ \frac{d}{dx} (2x-5) \right] (4x^2 + 2x)^{-1} + (2x - 5) \left[ \frac{d}{dx} (4x^2 + 2x)^{-1} \right] [/tex]
Getting ##d(2x-5)/dx## is easy; where you need to use the chain rule is in the second differentiation:
[tex] \frac{d(4x^2 + 2x)^{-1}}{dx} = \frac{d(4x^2 + 2x)^{-1}}{d (4x^2 + 2x)} \cdot \frac{d(4x^2 + 2x)}{dx} [/tex]
This means that if we have a function of the form ##f(x) = g(h(x))## we can let ##u = h(x)## and get
[tex] \frac{df}{dx} = \left. \frac{dg}{du} \right|_{u = h(x)} \cdot \frac{dh}{dx} [/tex]
For f = g(h) (with h = h(x)), a way of remembering this is to think of
[tex] \frac{df}{dx} = \frac{dg}{dh} \cdot \frac{dh}{dx} [/tex]
(cancelling the dh's).

Anyway, if ##h = 4x^2 + 2x## and ##g(h) = h^{-1}##, can you calculate ##dg/dh## and ##dh/dx##? That's all there is to it.
 
  • #6
Saracen Rue said:
I have never learned the chain rule method. Also, I'm not sure how the product rule would work here: the [itex](4x^2+2x)[/itex] term would be to the power of negative 1, and I'm not sure how to apply to product rule then. Sorry for being stupid, but I'm really new (not to mention bad) when it comes to calculus...
If your function is ##x(t) = \frac{2t - 5}{4t^2 + 2t}## (with change as noted by Krylov), and the objective is to find x'(t) without using the quotient rule, there are three other possibilities.
1) Use the definition of the derivative as the limit of a quotient.
2) Use the product rule and chain rule, writing the function as ##x(t) = (2t - 5) (4t^2 + 2t)^{-1}##
3) Use the product rule and a rule you might have learned about the derivative of the reciprocal of a function, with ##x(t) = (2t - 5) \left(\frac{1}{4t^2 + 2t}\right)## .

Choice 1 above would be pretty tricky, so it seems to me that one of the other two choices is what you're expected to use.
 
  • #7
Or you could express the fraction as

## \frac{(2x + 1) - 6}{2x (2x + 1)} ##

and I hope easy to see ways to proceed.
 
  • #8
You could use partial fraction decomposition. Then you only need to deal with ##\displaystyle \ \frac{A}{t}+ \frac{B}{2t+1}\ ## .

Alternatively, you could multiply both sides by the denominator, then do implicit differentiation.
 

What is the derivative of a fractional function without using the quotient rule?

The derivative of a fractional function can be found by using the power rule and the chain rule. First, rewrite the function as a power function, then use the power rule to find the derivative. Finally, use the chain rule to account for the fractional exponent in the original function.

Why is it important to know how to find the derivative of a fractional function without using the quotient rule?

Knowing how to find the derivative of a fractional function without using the quotient rule allows for a better understanding of the fundamental principles of calculus. It also allows for a more efficient and versatile approach to finding derivatives of more complex functions.

Can the quotient rule be used to find the derivative of a fractional function?

Yes, the quotient rule can be used to find the derivative of a fractional function. However, it may not always be the most efficient or straightforward method. In some cases, using the power rule and chain rule may be a simpler approach.

Are there any limitations to using the power rule and chain rule to find the derivative of a fractional function?

Yes, there are some limitations to using the power rule and chain rule. These methods may not work for more complicated functions or functions with multiple variables. In these cases, the quotient rule may be the best option for finding the derivative.

Can the derivative of a fractional function be found using other methods?

Yes, there are other methods that can be used to find the derivative of a fractional function, such as the product rule, quotient rule, and logarithmic differentiation. However, the power rule and chain rule are often the most efficient and straightforward methods for finding the derivative of a fractional function.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
364
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
924
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top