Difference: mean velocity & modulus of mean velocity vector

In summary, Homework Equations state that mean velocity is the vector consisting of the average speed and the displacement traveled. Mean velocity is different from the modulus of mean velocity vector because, in part b, the magnitude of the vector is taken. There is no difference in how to calculate the average velocity, but the formula for calculating the magnitude of the vector is different for non-zero constant tangent acceleration.
  • #1
Pushoam
962
51

Homework Statement



upload_2017-7-18_21-33-34.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
A)

Mean velocity is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken = πR/Γ = 0.5 m/s

B) How is part a) different from part b)?

I think what Irodov means by mean velocity is mean speed in part a.
It is mean speed which is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken .

In part b,
<v> is defined as <v> = total displacement traveled/ total time taken in the direction of total displacement
|<v>| = R/Γ = 0.32 m/s

Have I understood the difference between mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector properly?

How to calculate part c?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-7-18_20-55-5.png
    upload_2017-7-18_20-55-5.png
    20.4 KB · Views: 646
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am not sure about this terminology, either. But if you go halfway around the circle, your displacement will be the diameter of the circle, not the radius.
 
  • Like
Likes GrimReaper
  • #3
Pushoam said:
I think what Irodov means by mean velocity is mean speed in part a.
I think he means what he says -- mean velocity. Which is a vector.
Part B is then trivial -- take the magnitude of the vector.
Part C...

The question implies that it does not matter what tangential acceleration is as long as it is constant. So cheat and assume that tangential acceleration is zero.
 
  • #4
scottdave said:
But if you go halfway around the circle, your displacement will be the diameter of the circle, not the radius.
Yes, I calculated that way , but didn't write 2 before R. Thanks for pointing it out.
So, |<v>| = 2R/Γ = 0.32 m/s
 
  • #5
Pushoam said:
Mean velocity is defined as <v> = total distance traveled/ total time taken
I'm unsure whether you are saying that is how you believe it is defined or how Irodov defines it.
Distance traveled is generally taken to be the integral of a scalar, ##\int |\vec {ds}|##. Dividing that by ##\Delta t## gives average speed.
The integral ##\int\vec{ds}## gives the displacement, a vector. Dividing that by ##\Delta t## gives the average velocity.
 
  • #6
haruspex said:
I'm unsure whether you are saying that is how you believe it is defined or how Irodov defines it.
This is how I believe it is defined.

But, even if I take
<v> = ## \frac {\int |\vec {ds}|} {Δt} ##,

How will I calculate ## \int |\vec {ds}|## ?

I have to take ## \int |\vec {ds}| ## as total distance traveled in the time Γ.

So, how does this formulation make a difference?
 
  • #7
Pushoam said:
This is how I believe it is defined.
Then you are wrong.
The question asks for average velocity, which is ## <\vec v>=\frac {\int \vec {ds}} {Δt} = \frac {\vec r(t_0+\Delta t)-\vec r(t_0)}{\Delta t}##, where ##vec r = \vec r(t)## is the vector position. ##\vec r(t_0+\Delta t)-\vec r(t_0)## is the displacement.
What is the displacement in this case?
Pushoam said:
But, even if I take
<v> = ## \frac {\int |\vec {ds}|} {Δt} ##
As I wrote, that is average speed. In the present case, ##\int |\vec {ds}|=\pi R##.
Pushoam said:
B) How is part a) different from part b)?
It is a bit odd, but part b seems to be asking for the magnitude of the vector found in part a.
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
Then you are wrong.
The question asks for average velocity,

I am using Irodov's book.
And I feel that by the term" mean velocity", Irodov means "mean speed "and by the term "mean velocity vector", he means "mean velocity".
You can read the question for reference.
Assuming that the mean velocity is mean speed, Is what I wrote correct?
 
  • #9
Pushoam said:
I feel that by the term" mean velocity", Irodov means "mean speed "
Ah, I see. He writes v for ##|\vec v|## and v for ##\vec v##. Then yes, qn a is asking for mean speed and your answer is correct.
 
  • #10
For part c,

Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be 0,⇒ speed is constant ⇒ mean speed = instantaneous speed

<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= (v##\hat y## - v## (-\hat y##))/10 = 2*0.5/10 = 0.1 m/s2 ##\hat y##
| <w>| = 0.1 m/s2

But, how to show that this is true for any constant tangent acceleration?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Pushoam said:
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be 0,⇒ speed is constant ⇒ mean speed = instantaneous speed
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.

It is not said so in the question.
Nonetheless, I will try to solve it for non-zero constant tangent acceleration.
 
  • #13
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be c.
speed v = ct + vi
<v> = (1/τ)∫0τ(ct + vi)dt
= (cτ/2) + vi) = 0.5 m/s
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t

Taking vi =0,
cτ/2 = 0.5 m/s
So,| <w> |= c = 0.1 m/s2

How to solve it with non - zero vi?

<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2Is this correct?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
I suspect the question intends that it starts from rest, so the tangential acceleration is not zero.
Thinking about it some more, that assumption is unnecessary.
Pushoam said:
Taking the constant tangent acceleration to be c.
speed v = ct + vi
<v> = (1/τ)∫0τ(ct + vi)dt
= (cτ/2) + vi) = 0.5 m/s
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t

Taking vi =0,
cτ/2 = 0.5 m/s
So,| <w> |= c = 0.1 m/s2

How to solve it with non - zero vi?

<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2Is this correct?
Your method has found the constant tangential acceleration, but that is a scalar. The question (this time) clearly defines the acceleration sought as a vector.
Suppose the initial speed is vi in the positive x direction. What is the final speed, and in what direction? What is the change in velocity?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Your method has found the constant tangential acceleration, but that is a scalar. The question (this time) clearly defines the acceleration sought as a vector.
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
I am using Irodov's book.
And I feel that by the term"constant tangent acceleration ", Irodov means "magnitude of constant tangent acceleration "and by the term "constant tangent acceleration vector", he means "constant tangent acceleration".
You can read the question for reference.
Assuming that the constant tangent acceleration is magnitude of constant tangent acceleration, Is what I wrote correct?

Please, see post #8 and 9.
Even if you take constant tangent acceleration to be a vector, then this vector can't be constant as tangential direction itself goes on changing.
So, by constant tangent acceleration, what Irodov means is the magnitude of the tangent acceleration is constant.

Because of this acceleration, the speed will go on changing.
So, I have to calculate final speed.
Now, the direction of final velocity is opposite to the direction of the initial velocity. This is what I have donein #13.
haruspex said:
Suppose the initial speed is vi in the positive x direction. What is the final speed, and in what direction? What is the change in velocity?

I have calculated it.
Pushoam said:
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y## - vi(- ##\hat y##)]/t
 
  • #16
Pushoam said:
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
No it doesn't.
It tells you the tangent acceleration, ##\frac{d|\vec v|}{dt}##, is constant, but asks for modulus of the average total acceleration, ##|\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}|##

Pushoam said:
<w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
##= [ (ct + v_i)\hat y - v_i(- \hat y)]/t##
Ok, but the distance and time information you are given creates a relationship between vi and c. Try eliminating one from that expression.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
No it doesn't.
Sorry, what I meant by
Pushoam said:
The question asks for constant tangent acceleration.
is that the question tells to take constant tangent acceleration.
haruspex said:
but asks for modulus of the average total acceleration, |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##|
This is what I have calculated.
Isn't |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##| = <w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y ## - vi(- ##\hat y##) ]/t, Here t corresponds to Δt?
 
  • #18
Pushoam said:
Sorry, what I meant by

is that the question tells to take constant tangent acceleration.

This is what I have calculated.
Isn't |##\frac{\vec{\Delta v}}{\Delta t}##| = <w> =( vf - vi )/ Δt
= [ (ct + vi)##\hat y ## - vi(- ##\hat y##) ]/t, Here t corresponds to Δt?
Sorry, I edited my previous post in parallel with your last post. Please see my edit.
 
  • #19
haruspex said:
Ok, but the distance and time information you are given creates a relationship between vi and c. Try eliminating one from that expression.
I have done it in #13.
Pushoam said:
<v> = (cτ/2) + vi = 0.5 m/s
2 vi = 0.1 - cτ
|<w> | = [ ct + 2 vi]/τ = 0.1 m/s2
 
  • #20
Pushoam said:
I have done it in #13.
I'm very sorry, I didn't read it carefully enough.
I saw
Pushoam said:
How to solve it with non - zero vi?
and mistakenly assumed you had not found a way.
Yes, your answer in post #13 is fine.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam

1. What is the difference between mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector?

Mean velocity refers to the average speed or rate of change of an object's position over a certain period of time. It is a scalar quantity and is calculated by dividing the total distance traveled by the total time. On the other hand, modulus of mean velocity vector is a vector quantity that takes into account both the magnitude and direction of the mean velocity. It is calculated by taking the square root of the sum of the squared components of the mean velocity vector.

2. How are mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector related?

The modulus of mean velocity vector is simply the magnitude of the mean velocity vector. In other words, it is the absolute value of the mean velocity vector. Therefore, they are closely related and the modulus of mean velocity vector can be calculated using the mean velocity vector.

3. What are the units of measurement for mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector?

Mean velocity is typically measured in meters per second (m/s) or any other unit of distance over time. Modulus of mean velocity vector, being a vector quantity, is measured in the same units as the mean velocity vector, which is meters per second (m/s) or any other unit of distance over time.

4. How are mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector used in physics?

Mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector are used in physics to describe the motion of objects. They are important in calculating the displacement, acceleration, and other kinematic quantities of an object. In addition, they are used in various equations and formulas to analyze and predict the behavior of moving objects.

5. Can mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector be different for the same object?

Yes, mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector can be different for the same object. This is because mean velocity only takes into account the average speed of an object, while modulus of mean velocity vector considers both the magnitude and direction of the mean velocity. Therefore, if the object changes its direction while in motion, the mean velocity and modulus of mean velocity vector will be different.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
890
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
979
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
486
Back
Top