Dirac delta function approximation

  • #1
Lambda96
158
59
Homework Statement
show that the following applies ##\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g^{\epsilon}(x) \phi(x)dx = \phi(0)##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

I'm not sure if I have calculated task b correctly, and unfortunately I don't know what to do with task c?

Bildschirmfoto 2024-01-16 um 14.38.30.png


I solved task b as follows

##\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g^{\epsilon}(x) \phi(x)dx=\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{\infty}^{\epsilon} 0 \phi(x)dx + \displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{- \epsilon}^{\epsilon} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon} \phi(x)dx +\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{\epsilon}^{\infty} 0 \phi(x)dx=\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \int_{- \epsilon}^{\epsilon} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon} \phi(x)dx = \displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \frac{\varphi(\epsilon) - \varphi(- \epsilon)}{2 \epsilon}= \phi(0)##

Does task c mean the following
##\int_{- \epsilon}^{\epsilon} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon} \phi(x) dx=\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \sum\limits_{x= -\epsilon}^{\epsilon} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon} \phi(x)##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
task b) looks correct to me though the equality in the very last step is not so obvious and you have to show the intermediate steps (but I guess maybe in your book there is a sub problem that does that ). Also it is a bit confusing that you are using two different representations of the greek letter phi to denote a continuous function and its antiderivative.

Hold on while I process task c).
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #3
What you wrote in c) doesn't even make sense cause you seem to consider a sum over a continuous variable x, while the sum/series i know are over discrete variables from the set of integers.

What task wants you to is to write the integral as the limit of a Riemann sum and then take the limit for epsilon and then change the order with which you take the limits.

I mean the limit of a Riemann sum is something like $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(a+i\frac{b-a}{n})\frac{b-a}{n}$$ and then take the limit of this with epsilon tending to zero , setting first ##a=-\epsilon ,b=\epsilon## (##f(x)=g^e(x)\phi(x)##) and then first compute the limit as epsilon tending to zero and then in what is computed take the limit n tending to infinity. You ll find that you get infinity and not the desired result by doing it that way.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #4
For b I would not work with the antiderivative explicitly. Instead, I would apply the mean value theorem for integrals
$$
\int_a^b f(x) dx = (b-a) f(c)
$$
for some ##c## such that ##a<c<b##. This means that
$$
\frac 1{2\epsilon} \int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon \phi(x)dx
= \phi(x^*_\epsilon)
$$
where ##|x^*_\epsilon | < \epsilon## such that ##\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \phi(x^*_{\epsilon}) = \phi(0)##. It just feels cleaner to me.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #5
Orodruin said:
It just feels cleaner to me.
The whole idea seems nice and neat except that it is not so clear to me that $$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} x_{\epsilon}^{*}=0$$.
 
  • #6
To the OP:
Forget what i said in post #3 about the limit of the Riemann sum ( i ll leave the post there though and not delete it cause it might seem interesting to you)

What c) wants you to do is to compute $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}g^{\epsilon}(x)\phi(x)dx$$
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #7
Delta2 said:
The whole idea seems nice and neat except that it is not so clear to me that $$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} x_{\epsilon}^{*}=0$$.
If you choose ##\epsilon > 0## then for any ##\delta < \epsilon##: ##|x^*_{\delta}-0| < \epsilon## so ##x^*_\epsilon## converges to zero by definition.
 
  • Wow
Likes Delta2
  • #8
Orodruin said:
If you choose ##\epsilon > 0## then for any ##\delta < \epsilon##: ##|x^*_{\delta}-0| < \epsilon## so ##x^*_\epsilon## converges to zero by definition.
Ye ok what confused me is the way you write it it seems to be a sequence with a continuous variable as index so you know very confusing but it is in fact a real function $$x_{\epsilon}^{*}=h(\epsilon)$$ such that $$|h(\epsilon)|<\epsilon$$ from which it follows that that limit is zero indeed.
 
  • #9
Thank you Delta2 and Orodruin for your help 👍 👍

I have now tried to calculate the task c

##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} g^{\epsilon}(x)\phi(x)dx=\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon}\phi(x)##

But if I now form the limit value, I get ##\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon}=\infty## or am I misinterpreting the term in the integral?
 
  • #10
Lambda96 said:
Thank you Delta2 and Orodruin for your help 👍 👍

I have now tried to calculate the task c

##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} g^{\epsilon}(x)\phi(x)dx=\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon}\phi(x)##

But if I now form the limit value, I get ##\displaystyle{\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}} \frac{1}{2 \epsilon}=\infty## or am I misinterpreting the term in the integral?
You cannot take the integral out of the limit. Its boundaries depend on ##\epsilon##!
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and Delta2
  • #11
Orodruin said:
You cannot take the integral out of the limit. Its boundaries depend on ##\epsilon##!
That's correct but i also kinda did what the OP did at #9 and i thought we get ##+\infty## in this case. But i see now its wrong. So I cant understand what task c is supposed to mean.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #12
Thank you Orodruin and Delta2 for your help 👍👍

Unfortunately, I also don't understand what is meant by commuting the integral and the limit. Isn't the integral (1) a Riemann integral, why does the problem specifically state that it should now be interpreted as one?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #13
Lambda96 said:
Thank you Orodruin and Delta2 for your help 👍👍

Unfortunately, I also don't understand what is meant by commuting the integral and the limit. Isn't the integral (1) a Riemann integral, why does the problem specifically state that it should now be interpreted as one?
I had the exact same question to myself . That is a Riemann definite integral anyway it isnt a Lebesque integral. The only thing I see is that the task means to view it as the limit of a Riemann sum (as i describe in post #3) and not as an antiderivative by using the fundamental theorem of calculus.
 
  • #14
Ah hm , I think afterall what i say in post #6 is what the task c wants us to do but we didnt calculate it correctly.

I think that ##\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}g^{\epsilon}(x)=0## think about it and tell me your thoughts. So that integral is 0.
 

1. What is the Dirac delta function approximation?

The Dirac delta function approximation is a mathematical tool used to represent an idealized point source or impulse in physics and engineering. It is defined as a function that is zero everywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite, while still having an integral of 1 over the entire real line.

2. How is the Dirac delta function approximation used in practice?

In practice, the Dirac delta function approximation is used to simplify mathematical calculations involving point sources or impulses. It can be used to model physical systems with concentrated forces or moments, such as in structural mechanics or signal processing.

3. What are some properties of the Dirac delta function approximation?

Some properties of the Dirac delta function approximation include the sifting property, which states that the integral of the product of the Dirac delta function with another function is equal to the value of the function at the origin. It also has a scaling property and a shifting property, among others.

4. Can the Dirac delta function approximation be represented graphically?

While the Dirac delta function itself cannot be graphically represented due to its infinite nature, it can be approximated by a narrow and tall spike centered at the origin. This spike gets narrower and taller as it approaches the idealized Dirac delta function.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Dirac delta function approximation?

One limitation of the Dirac delta function approximation is that it is an idealized mathematical construct and does not exist physically. In practice, it is often used as a convenient mathematical tool, but care must be taken when interpreting results obtained using the Dirac delta function approximation.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
550
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
854
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
375
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
389
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
918
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
604
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
631
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
714
Back
Top