Do particles "care" about consciousness or simply the data

In summary, variations of the double slit experiment have been conducted where the behavior of particles was observed by a computer or a conscious person. However, all practical executions of the experiment have used non-conscious measuring devices, and there is no evidence to suggest that particles are affected by human observation. This idea is based on an urban legend that has been debunked by modern quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Jacob Gable
2
0
I'm curious if there have been any variations to the double slit that specifically looked at whether the particles behavior was determined by the computer keeping the data or if a consious person was there to see it. For example what I had in mind was having an isolated room where the computer would choose to keep the data for maybe a few seconds before erasing it. Then compare the pattern when nobody is near the room to see the result before being erased to having a person in the room who can momentarily see it before being erased.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jacob Gable said:
I'm curious if there have been any variations to the double slit that specifically looked at whether the particles behavior was determined by the computer keeping the data or if a consious person was there to see it. For example what I had in mind was having an isolated room where the computer would choose to keep the data for maybe a few seconds before erasing it. Then compare the pattern when nobody is near the room to see the result before being erased to having a person in the room who can momentarily see it before being erased.
This has been done many times. Every practical execution of the double slit experiment has used non-conscious (electronic computers these days, but photographic film, photodetectors, and the like before we had modern electronics to help with our experimental designs) as measuring devices. In all cases, the experimental outcomes are solidly established before any conscious human looks at them.

Furthermore, no one is seriously suggesting that it might be otherwise. This entire idea that the particles care whether they're being observed or not is an urban legend, one that crept into the popular imagination a century ago before the modern formulation of quantum mechanics had been discovered.

You might want to give David Lindley's book "Where did the weirdness go?" a try, as an antidote to the urban legend. However, as this thread is based on a misunderstanding, we can close it now.
 

1. Do particles have consciousness?

No, particles do not have consciousness. Consciousness is a complex cognitive process that requires a highly organized and functioning brain. Particles, on the other hand, are tiny units of matter that do not possess the capacity for consciousness.

2. Can consciousness affect the behavior of particles?

There is no scientific evidence to suggest that consciousness has any direct impact on the behavior of particles. The behavior of particles is governed by the laws of physics and can be predicted and explained through scientific principles.

3. Do particles react differently to conscious observation?

There is a popular theory called the "observer effect" that suggests particles behave differently when they are being observed by a conscious observer. However, this theory has not been conclusively proven and is still a topic of debate among scientists.

4. Can we measure consciousness in particles?

No, consciousness is a subjective experience and cannot be measured in particles. While we can observe and measure the behavior of particles, consciousness is a complex concept that is difficult to quantify.

5. Is there a connection between consciousness and quantum mechanics?

Some theories propose a link between consciousness and quantum mechanics, but this is still a highly debated and controversial topic in the scientific community. There is no concrete evidence to support this connection at this time.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
644
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
283
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
565
Replies
5
Views
297
Replies
60
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top