- #36
Stevexyz
- 25
- 3
Perhaps you could summarise them for me and others would have kindly posted here.weirdoguy said:It does provide answers and you were given them multiple times. You are not reading what others are saying.
Perhaps you could summarise them for me and others would have kindly posted here.weirdoguy said:It does provide answers and you were given them multiple times. You are not reading what others are saying.
You cannot define time for a photon. Thus asking about its experience of time is meaningless.Stevexyz said:Perhaps you could summarise them for me and others would have kindly posted here.
Is it therefore pointless trying to use special relativity to understand the "nature of time" for photons for other massless particles?Ibix said:You cannot define time for a photon. Thus asking about its experience of time is meaningless.
Stevexyz said:Is it therefore pointless trying to use special relativity to understand the "nature of time" for photons
... and we're running in circles.Ibix said:You cannot define time for a photon. Thus asking about its experience of time is meaningless.
Not pointless - Special Relativity is the best starting point. But you will have to learn what SR says and to do that you’ll want to put some effort into a working through a good textbook; my favorite is “Spacetime Physics” by Taylor and Wheeler.Stevexyz said:Is it therefore pointless trying to use special relativity to understand the "nature of time" for photons for other massless particles?