Does a black hole cut the fabric of spacetime as it changes

In summary, Einstein's general theory of relativity describes the stars distorting the local geometry of spacetime through the use of a metric tensor. The singularity of a black hole causes the metric to develop infinities, indicating a problem with the math. There is no fabric or hole in spacetime, and the concept of a black hole "cutting" the fabric of spacetime is a common misconception. The metric expansion of space does not cause a black hole to physically move or "drag" spacetime with it. These misconceptions stem from misunderstandings of the mathematics and physics involved.
  • #1
SD das
20
0
Einstein's general theory of relativity describes the stars distort spacetime fabric and it appears a black hole makes a hole in the spacetime fabric. It is evident that the size of a galaxy does not change due to gravity but in large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space. Therefore, does a black hole cut the fabric of spacetime as it changes is position as the distance of galaxies increases? It is known, most of the galaxies contain million of stars, many black holes and specifically a supermassive black hole in its centre.

Therefore, I was wondering about the consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by an entire galaxy! Can you suggest?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
SD das said:
Einstein's general theory of relativity describes the stars distort spacetime fabric and it appears a black hole makes a hole in the spacetime fabric.

This is a common misconception. Spacetime is described by a mathematical object known as a metric tensor. This describes the local geometry of spacetime at any point in an analogous way that an electric field describes the force that a charged particle would experience at any point in space. A black hole's singularity causes the metric to develop infinities, indicating a problem. There is no fabric and no hole. It's just a point where the math behaves in a way that makes it impossible to make predictions. Singularities exist in other areas of physics and math and usually indicate that you're doing something incorrectly, don't know the correct laws to use, and sometimes don't represent anything physical at all (cusp singularities of optical caustics).

SD das said:
It is evident that the size of a galaxy does not change due to gravity but in large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space. Therefore, does a black hole cut the fabric of spacetime as it changes is position as the distance of galaxies increases?

It does not. There is no cutting of fabric at all.
 
  • #3
Drakkith said:
This is a common misconception. Spacetime is described by a mathematical object known as a metric tensor. This describes the local geometry of spacetime at any point in an analogous way that an electric field describes the force that a charged particle would experience at any point in space. A black hole's singularity causes the metric to develop infinities, indicating a problem. There is no fabric and no hole. It's just a point where the math behaves in a way that makes it impossible to make predictions. Singularities exist in other areas of physics and math and usually indicate that you're doing something incorrectly, don't know the correct laws to use, and sometimes don't represent anything physical at all (cusp singularities of optical caustics).
you say misconception but (1) what is a misconception I don't get, besides (2) are you saying spacetime is described by metric tensor but I see it is described as, "In the mathematical field of differential geometry, a metric tensor is a type of function which takes as input a pair of tangent vectors v and w at a point of a surface (or higher dimensional differentiable manifold) and produces a real number scalar g(v, w) in a way that generalizes many of the familiar properties of" please clarify the issues (1) and (2) above
 
  • #4
Drakkith said:
It does not. There is no cutting of fabric at all.
Why not? ... In large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space... so since a black hole is an entity in a galaxy it will move too... besides it is known that a black hole put a dent in the spacetime, a dent means, break, crush, cripple, destroy, damage etc. therefore since a black hole moves in the spacetime with its containing galaxy, the dent put by same black hole will drag along the spacetime with its movement in it... however, the dent as dragged by the black hole making a cut might heal as the dent moves that may cause gravitational wave too.. now tell me where my guesswork went wrong, would you?
 
  • #5
SD das said:
Why not? ... In large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space... so since a black hole is an entity in a galaxy it will move too... besides it is known that a black hole put a dent in the spacetime, a dent means, break, crush, cripple, destroy, damage etc. therefore since a black hole moves in the spacetime with its containing galaxy, the dent put by same black hole will drag along the spacetime with its movement in it... however, the dent as dragged by the black hole making a cut might heal as the dent moves that may cause gravitational wave too.. now tell me where my guesswork went wrong, would you?
Drakkith said:
It does not. There is no cutting of fabric at all.
Note1, Metric Expansion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_space
 
  • #6
Drakkith said:
This is a common misconception. Spacetime is described by a mathematical object known as a metric tensor. This describes the local geometry of spacetime at any point in an analogous way that an electric field describes the force that a charged particle would experience at any point in space. A black hole's singularity causes the metric to develop infinities, indicating a problem. There is no fabric and no hole. It's just a point where the math behaves in a way that makes it impossible to make predictions. Singularities exist in other areas of physics and math and usually indicate that you're doing something incorrectly, don't know the correct laws to use, and sometimes don't represent anything physical at all (cusp singularities of optical caustics).
It does not. There is no cutting of fabric at all.
Note 2: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time...http://www.space.com/1976-black-hole-puts-dent-space-time...
 
  • #7
Drakkith said:
This is a common misconception. Spacetime is described by a mathematical object known as a metric tensor. This describes the local geometry of spacetime at any point in an analogous way that an electric field describes the force that a charged particle would experience at any point in space. A black hole's singularity causes the metric to develop infinities, indicating a problem. There is no fabric and no hole. It's just a point where the math behaves in a way that makes it impossible to make predictions. Singularities exist in other areas of physics and math and usually indicate that you're doing something incorrectly, don't know the correct laws to use, and sometimes don't represent anything physical at all (cusp singularities of optical caustics).
It does not. There is no cutting of fabric at all.
Note 3: What makes a supermassive black hole move through space? https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...-a-supermassive-black-hole-move-through-space
 
  • #8
None of the articles contradict in any way anything that Drakkith said. What is your specific point of confusion? If you still think there is a "fabric" then you are adhering to pop-sci nonsense, not science.

And by the way, the statement "It is known, most of the galaxies contain million of stars" is off by a factor of 1,000
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
  • #9
SD das said:
you say misconception but (1) what is a misconception I don't get
There is no fabric. The misconception is simply that there is a fabric. Since there is no fabric it doesn't make sense to ask if it can be cut or torn.

It is a common misconception because, unfortunately, many authors of pop-sci media describe it that way. So we completely understand the source of your misconception, and are simply trying to help you learn correct physics instead.
 
  • #10
SD das said:
Einstein's general theory of relativity describes the stars distort spacetime fabric and it appears a black hole makes a hole in the spacetime fabric. It is evident that the size of a galaxy does not change due to gravity but in large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space. Therefore, does a black hole cut the fabric of spacetime as it changes is position as the distance of galaxies increases? It is known, most of the galaxies contain million of stars, many black holes and specifically a supermassive black hole in its centre.

Therefore, I was wondering about the consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by an entire galaxy! Can you suggest?

I took a look at the space.com article:

"Spacetime

Spacetime can be thought of as an elastic sheet that bends under the weight of objects placed upon it. The more massive the object, the more spacetime bends."

The problem with trying to understand this is that you are trying to understand something that is fundamentally wrong. I'm not sure why the elastic sheet analogy is so widespread as it is highly misleading.

Another inaccuracy is that it is not the mass of an object but a combination of its mass and density that curves spacetime. A star may have just as much mass as a black hole, but because of its size we see essentially regular "Newtonian" gravity around it. In fact, even if the Sun were a black hole, the Earth would stay in its current orbit, as it's only close to the black hole that you get extreme curvature.

A galaxy is not very dense, hence the curvature of spacetime outside a galaxy is low.
 
  • #11
SD das said:
Einstein's general theory of relativity describes the stars distort spacetime fabric and it appears a black hole makes a hole in the spacetime fabric. It is evident that the size of a galaxy does not change due to gravity but in large scale the distance between two distant galaxies increases due to the metric expansion of space. Therefore, does a black hole cut the fabric of spacetime as it changes is position as the distance of galaxies increases? It is known, most of the galaxies contain million of stars, many black holes and specifically a supermassive black hole in its centre.

Therefore, I was wondering about the consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by an entire galaxy! Can you suggest?
The spacetime surrounding a black hole is smooth and regular. There are no irregularities that could be interpreted as a "cut" or "tear".
 
  • #12
Several posts have been removed and the thread is now re-opened.
 
  • #13
Drakkith said:
This describes the local geometry of spacetime at any point in an analogous way that an electric field describes the force that a charged particle would experience at any point in space.

Is this line of thinking what drives theorizing about gravitons? Its hard for me to picture without bringing some graviton-esque things in there somewhere ...
 
  • #14
Grinkle said:
Is this line of thinking what drives theorizing about gravitons? Its hard for me to picture without bringing some graviton-esque things in there somewhere ...

I don't know. Both the classical electromagnetic field and the curvature of spacetime according to GR are non-quantum descriptions. How you get from there to gravitons probably requires looking into quantum theory.
 
  • Like
Likes Grinkle
  • #15
Grinkle said:
Is this line of thinking what drives theorizing about gravitons?

Meaning, the analogy with electromagnetism? Sort of, in the sense that, since we now have quantum field theories of the other fundamental interactions, the natural expectation is that there would also be a quantum field theory of gravity. For reasons which are typically addressed as exercises in GR textbooks (for example, MTW does it in a fairly early chapter), a quantum field theory of gravity, along the lines of our other QFTs, would have to be a theory of a massless spin-2 field (whereas the QFT of electromagnetism is a theory of a massless spin-1 field); the particle associated with excitations of this field is called the "graviton".

This sort of theory was investigated in the 1960s and early 1970s by Feynman, Deser, and others. It has been discussed on this forum before, but not recently AFAIK.
 
  • Like
Likes Grinkle
  • #16
What does 'cut a hole' in spacetime actually mean? Evidently you view spacetime as some kind of quilt over the mattress of some grander reality. That's the kind of nonsense I would expect from a multiversalist. Apologies for not better disguising my contempt.
 

1. What is a black hole?

A black hole is an extremely dense region in space where the gravitational pull is so strong that nothing, including light, can escape from it. It is formed when a massive star dies and its core collapses under the force of its own gravity.

2. How does a black hole change the fabric of spacetime?

A black hole's immense gravitational pull warps the fabric of spacetime around it. This means that the path of light and matter near the black hole is distorted, and time moves slower the closer you get to the black hole.

3. Does a black hole actually "cut" the fabric of spacetime?

No, a black hole does not physically cut the fabric of spacetime. This phrase is often used as a metaphor to describe the intense warping of spacetime around a black hole.

4. Can the fabric of spacetime be repaired or restored after a black hole changes it?

The fabric of spacetime is not a physical material that can be repaired or restored. However, the distortions caused by a black hole will eventually dissipate as the black hole loses mass and energy over time.

5. Is the fabric of spacetime affected by anything else besides black holes?

Yes, the fabric of spacetime can be affected by any object with mass and energy. However, the effects are much more significant with black holes due to their immense gravitational pull.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top