Effect of the Galactic plane on the COBE CMBR measurements

In summary, the CMB data shows that our local group of galaxies is moving at a certain speed relative to the reference frame of the CMB, resulting in an anisotropy of the data. The standard interpretation is a velocity redshift and blueshift, but alternative models can also explain some of the observed temperature variations. There is also interest in the power spectrum of galaxies and their contribution to the CMB signal strength. Black body radiation and its properties are also relevant to understanding the CMB. Possible sources of CMBR interference include emission lines in the THz region and synchrotron emission from nonthermal electrons. However, these questions are not easily answerable and are still being studied by cosmologists.
  • #1
Tanelorn
888
15
http://cosmos.lbl.gov/two_four_maps.html

http://cosmos.lbl.gov/Images/phys_today_cover_big.gif

CMBR dipole anisotropyFrom the CMB data it is seen that our local group of galaxies (the galactic cluster that includes the Solar System's Milky Way Galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude l = 276±3°, b = 30±3°.[60] This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).[61] The standard interpretation of this temperature variation is a simple velocity redshift and blueshift due to motion relative to the CMB, but alternative cosmological models can explain some fraction of the observed dipole temperature distribution in the CMB


I was trying to find out if our galaxy has a power spectrum which can also be considered a black body with a certain temperature?


Also regarding the CMBR black body radiation what is the radiation signal strength or spectral power density and what does this tell us?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #3
Thanks Drakkith. What are MJy/sr and how do I convert to W/√Hz?


Answering my own question, I am guessing that the power spectrum of a galaxy is nothing like a black body. So the in band radiation is an interferer for the CMBR measurement.


How much radiation energy is out there from an infinite universe full of galaxies? Just wondering how much they all contribute to or interfere with the received CMBR radiation signal strength?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thanks Drakkith, I learned about Janskys today!
 
  • #6
So how much radiation energy is out there from an infinite universe full of galaxies? Just wondering how much they all contribute to, or interfere with, the received CMBR signal strength?

I understand that Cosmologists are trying to find tiny variations in the CMBR, but it occurred to me that clusters and superclusters of galaxies could also be contributing to the received RF in a similar way to the way our galaxy interferes, as mentioned above. So I just wondered what are the estimated relative levels for the galactic radiation (RF), compared to the CMBR signal strength?

Also are there any other known mechanisms out there for producing RF interference with similar frequency to the CMBR?



CMBR Center Frequency:

Precise measurements of cosmic background radiation are critical to cosmology, since any proposed model of the universe must explain this radiation. The CMBR has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.725 K, thus the spectrum peaks in the microwave range frequency of 160.2 GHz, corresponding to a 1.9 mm wavelength. This holds if measured per unit frequency, as in Planck's law. If measured instead per unit wavelength, using Wien's law, the peak will be at 1.06 mm corresponding to a frequency of 283 GHz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation



Black Body Radiation:

A black body is an idealized physical body that absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation. Because of this perfect absorptivity at all wavelengths, a black body is also the best possible emitter of thermal radiation, which it radiates incandescently in a characteristic, continuous spectrum that depends on the body's temperature.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbody_radiation



So could the thinly spread matter between galaxies absorb radiation energy from galaxies and then emit radiation energy at the CMBR frequency like a black body described above?



Possible sources of CMBR interference: Emisson lines in the THz region:


http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/f04/papers/FRBIS02/FRBIS02.PDF

"However, the CO transition at 115 GHz has been detected in FSC10214 and should be observable with an enhanced VLA in many sources":
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/vla/upgrade/node98.html

"Using the waveguide-type sideband-separating SIS mixer for the 200 GHz band, we initiated the first simultaneous 12CO (J = 2 - 1) and 13CO (J = 2 - 1) survey of the galactic plane as well as large-scale mapping observations of nearby molecular clouds":
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASJ...59.1005N

"Evidence that Synchrotron Emission from Nonthermal Electrons Produces the Increasing Submillimeter Spectral Component in Solar Flares":
We investigate the origin of the increasing spectra observed at submillimeter wavelengths detected in the flare on 2 November 2003 starting at 17:17 UT. This flare, classified as an X8.3 and 2B event, was simultaneously detected by RHESSI and the Solar Submillimeter Telescope (SST) at 212 and 405 GHz.
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~share/publications/silva_07.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Are these questions useful?
 
  • #8
Tanelorn said:
Are these questions useful?

Sure. They just aren't easily answerable. I assume cosmologists or whoever that work with the CMB have to account for these variations, I just don't know how they do that.
 

1. What is the galactic plane and how does it affect COBE CMBR measurements?

The galactic plane is the disk-shaped region in the Milky Way galaxy where the majority of stars, gas, and dust reside. It can have a significant impact on the measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) taken by the COBE satellite. This is because the galactic plane emits its own radiation, which can interfere with the CMBR signal and make it difficult to accurately measure.

2. How does the galactic plane affect the accuracy of COBE CMBR measurements?

The galactic plane can affect the accuracy of COBE CMBR measurements in two ways. First, the emission from the galactic plane can contaminate the CMBR signal, making it harder to distinguish between the two. Second, the galactic plane can also block the view of the CMBR, limiting the amount of data that can be collected and potentially introducing errors in the measurements.

3. Are there any efforts to mitigate the impact of the galactic plane on COBE CMBR measurements?

Yes, there are several techniques used to minimize the effects of the galactic plane on COBE CMBR measurements. One method is to carefully map and subtract out the emission from the galactic plane in the data analysis process. Another approach is to carefully choose the observation points and angles to avoid the galactic plane as much as possible.

4. How does the galactic plane affect our understanding of the early universe through COBE CMBR measurements?

The galactic plane can have a significant impact on our understanding of the early universe through COBE CMBR measurements. The CMBR is a snapshot of the universe only 380,000 years after the Big Bang, and any interference or contamination from the galactic plane can distort this signal and affect our interpretation of the data. It is essential to account for the galactic plane's effects to accurately reconstruct the early universe's conditions.

5. Is the galactic plane the only factor that can affect COBE CMBR measurements?

No, the galactic plane is not the only factor that can affect COBE CMBR measurements. Other sources of interference, such as other galaxies, cosmic dust, and the Sun's emission, can also impact the measurements. Scientists must carefully account for and mitigate all these factors to obtain accurate and reliable measurements of the CMBR.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top