"Energy Type Functionals" in Jackson

In summary: So, this is the unique functional that yields the correct E-L equation.In summary, Jackson introduces a functional I[\psi] that yields the correct equations of motion for the electrostatic potential, and then compares it to the functional A[\psi] that is derived from the E-L equation with the correct source term. He shows that the two functionals are not the same, and explains why we need to double count the energy in order to get the correct equations of motion. He also explains how this functional can be derived from Noether's theorem and the proper orthochronous Poincare group.
  • #1
Luke Tan
29
2
TL;DR Summary
Why does Jackson's "Energy Type Functionals" seem to double count the energy?
In section 1.12 Variational Approach to the Solution of the Laplace and Poisson Equations, Jackson mentions that in electrostatics, we can consider "energy type functionals". He gives, for Dirichlet Boundary Conditions,
$$I[\psi]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{V}\nabla\psi\cdot\nabla\psi d^3x-\int_{V}g\psi d^3 x$$
After variation, he then finds the equations of motion,
$$\nabla^2\psi=-g$$
This would intuitively lead me to make the identification of ##\psi=\phi## as the scalar potential, and ##g=\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}## to be the charge density. However, substituting this into the functional gives
$$I[\psi]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{V}|\vec{E}|^2d^3x-\frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\int_{V}\rho\phi d^3x$$
The first term is the electrostatic energy, and the second is the electrostatic energy too. Doesn't this double count the energy? While I understand that if energy is minimized, twice the energy is minimized too, why must we double count the energy in order to get the correct equations of motion? Why can't we just minimize this functional?
$$I[\psi]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{V}|\vec{E}|^2d^3x$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why should the functional be the field energy to begin with? It's just a functional letting you derive the electrostatic field equations given the source ##g=\rho/\epsilon_0##.

To get the field energy (as well as momentum and angular momentum) from variational principles you need to analyze the action functional and apply Noether's theorem to the relativistic space-time symmetries (temporal and spatial translations, rotations, Lorentz boosts, in short the proper orthochronous Poincare group).
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #3
Luke Tan said:
[tex]I[\psi]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{V}|\vec{E}|^2d^3x-\frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\int_{V}\rho\phi d^3x[/tex]
The first term is the electrostatic energy, and the second is the electrostatic energy too.

No, the second term is not the electrostatic energy. The electrostatic energy is given by [tex]\mathcal{E} = \frac{1}{2}\int d^{3}x \ \rho (x) \ \varphi (x).[/tex] If you use [tex]\rho = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = - \frac{1}{4 \pi} \nabla^{2}\varphi ,[/tex] and integrate by parts, you find [tex]\frac{1}{2}\int d^{3}x \ \rho (x) \ \varphi (x) = \frac{1}{8 \pi} \int d^{3}x \ \nabla \varphi \cdot \nabla \varphi = \frac{1}{8 \pi} \int d^{3}x \ \vec{E} \cdot \vec{E} .[/tex] So, if you rearrange the terms, you find [tex]\mathcal{E} - \int d^{3}x \ \rho (x) \varphi (x) = \int d^{3}x \left( \frac{1}{8 \pi} \nabla \varphi \cdot \nabla \varphi - \rho \ \varphi \right) = -\frac{1}{2} \int d^{3}x \ \rho (x) \varphi (x) .[/tex] Clearly, the expression in the middle (which is the [itex]I[\varphi][/itex] of Jackson) is not double the electrostatic energy.
Now, the meaningful question (which I will answer) is: where did Jackson get his functional from? Well, he knew that [itex]\nabla^{2}\varphi + 4 \pi \rho = 0[/itex]. So, he needs to construct [itex]A[\varphi][/itex] such that [tex]\frac{\delta A}{\delta \varphi} = - \left( \nabla^{2}\varphi + 4 \pi \rho \right) .[/tex] The minus sign is there for convenience and allows us to interpret [itex]A[\varphi][/itex] as “energy functional”. Assuming that the functional [itex]A[/itex] exists, we consider the functional [itex]A[\psi_{\lambda}][/itex] evaluated along the straight line “path” [tex]\psi_{\lambda}(x) = \lambda \varphi (x) + (1 - \lambda ) \psi_{0}(x) , \ \ \ \ \ 0 \leq \lambda \leq 1 ,[/tex] that begins at the point [itex]\psi_{0}(x) = 0[/itex] and end at [itex]\psi_{1}(x) = \varphi (x)[/itex]. The derivative of the functional [itex]A[\psi_{\lambda}][/itex] with respect to [itex]\lambda[/itex] is [tex]\frac{d}{d\lambda}A[\psi_{\lambda}] = \int d^{3}x \frac{\delta A}{\delta \psi_{\lambda}} \frac{\partial \psi_{\lambda}}{\partial \lambda} .[/tex] Now, using [tex]\frac{\delta A}{\delta \psi_{\lambda}} = - \left( \nabla^{2} \psi_{\lambda} + 4 \pi \rho \right), \ \ \ \ \frac{\partial \psi_{\lambda}(x)}{\partial \lambda} = \varphi (x),[/tex] we find
[tex]\frac{d}{d\lambda}A[\psi_{\lambda}] = - \int d^{3}x \left( \lambda \ \nabla^{2}\varphi + 4 \pi \rho (x) \right) \varphi (x) .[/tex] Integrating from [itex]\lambda = 0[/itex] to [itex]\lambda = 1[/itex], we find [tex]A[\psi_{1}] \equiv A[\varphi] = \int d^{3}x \left( - \frac{1}{2} \varphi \nabla^{2}\varphi - 4 \pi \rho (x) \varphi (x) \right) + \mbox{Const.} \ ,[/tex] where the constant term is [itex]A[\psi_{0}][/itex]. Finally, integrating the first term by parts gives us the wanted “energy functional” (up to additive constant) [tex]A[\varphi] = \int d^{3}x \left( \frac{1}{2} \nabla \varphi \cdot \nabla \varphi - 4 \pi \ \rho (x) \varphi (x) \right) .[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi and vanhees71

1. What are energy type functionals in Jackson?

Energy type functionals in Jackson refer to mathematical expressions used to describe the energy of a system in terms of its physical properties, such as electric and magnetic fields. These functionals are used in classical electrodynamics to calculate the energy of a system and its behavior.

2. How are energy type functionals used in Jackson?

In Jackson's classical electrodynamics, energy type functionals are used to calculate the energy of a system and its behavior. They are essential in understanding the dynamics of electromagnetic fields and their interactions with matter.

3. What is the difference between energy type functionals and energy functionals?

The main difference between energy type functionals and energy functionals lies in the type of energy they describe. Energy type functionals are used to describe the energy of a system in terms of its physical properties, while energy functionals are used to describe the total energy of a system, including both its physical and chemical properties.

4. Can energy type functionals be applied to any system?

Yes, energy type functionals can be applied to any system as long as it is described by classical electrodynamics. This includes systems with electric and magnetic fields, such as charged particles, electromagnetic waves, and more complex systems like plasmas.

5. Are there any limitations to using energy type functionals in Jackson's classical electrodynamics?

While energy type functionals are widely used in classical electrodynamics, they have some limitations. They are based on classical theories and do not take into account quantum effects. Additionally, they may not accurately describe systems with strong interactions or high energies, where quantum effects become significant.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
147
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
763
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
860
  • Classical Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
590
Replies
2
Views
803
Replies
42
Views
3K
Back
Top