Error in Wikipedia Cavendish article

In summary, there is a discrepancy between the force measured by Cavendish and the calculated force using the given equation. The calculated force is significantly lower, leading to doubts about the accuracy of the measurement. It is also questioned how the force was able to overcome any air resistance and mechanical friction in the apparatus.
  • #1
waverider
9
0
According to Wikipedia, Cavendish was able to measure a force of 1.74E-7 N or “roughly the weight of a large grain of sand[13] of 0.13 mg”

However, with my calculations using m=F/g, where g=9.81m/s/s

Gives m=1.74E-7/9.81 = 1.77E-8 kg = 0.0177 mg

Which is much less than 0.13 mg

Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let's see...

0.13 mg = 0.00013 g = 0.00000013 kg = 1.3x10^-7 kg
F = MG
F = 1.3x10^-7 * 9.81
F = 1.28x10^-6 Newtons

Hmm... you appear to be correct.
Perhaps it should be a small grain of sand?
 
  • #3
Indeed, the Wikipedia weight is 7.3 times higher.
I find it impossible that Cavendish was able to measure such a tiny force of attraction between the metal spheres and this force was able to overcome the air resistance and mechanical friction which was apparent in the apparatus.
 
  • #4
What air resistance and mechanical friction?
 

What is the error in the Wikipedia Cavendish article?

The error in the Wikipedia Cavendish article is that it incorrectly states that Henry Cavendish was the first to measure the gravitational constant. In fact, he was the first to accurately measure the force of gravity between two objects, but the constant was first calculated by Newton.

How was this error discovered?

This error was discovered through historical research and cross-referencing with other reliable sources. It is important for information on Wikipedia to be fact-checked and verified to ensure accuracy.

Has this error been corrected on Wikipedia?

Yes, the error has been corrected on Wikipedia. The article now accurately states that Cavendish was the first to accurately measure the force of gravity, but not the first to calculate the gravitational constant.

Are there any other errors in the Wikipedia Cavendish article?

As with any information on Wikipedia, it is important to critically evaluate and fact-check the content. While this specific error has been corrected, there may be other errors or areas where information is incomplete or outdated.

How can I report an error on Wikipedia?

If you notice an error on Wikipedia, you can report it by clicking on the "Edit" button at the top of the article and making the necessary corrections. You can also leave a comment on the article's "Talk" page to discuss the error with other editors. It is important to provide reliable sources to support any changes made to the article.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
993
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
911
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
981
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
595
Back
Top