Estimating the Bohr radius from the uncertainty principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the Bohr radius using the uncertainty principle, with the initial approach involving the momentum equation p=h/r. The poster suggests substituting kinetic and potential energy to derive an energy function E=E(r) and then finding its minimum through differentiation. There is a consensus that the problem is straightforward and does not require excessive rigor, as it relies on approximations and assumptions. The poster seeks confirmation on whether their approach is correct or if any critical elements are overlooked. Overall, the method appears valid for estimating the Bohr radius.
drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
In the below picture
Relevant Equations
Heisenberg uncertainty i guess
1649908091019.png


Soo. I think this problem is too direct and easy so I think I got it in wrong way: p=h/r and then plug in the K and V and then we get E=E(r) and get derivative and we have minimum? What do you think? is there sth I am missing?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems fine to me. It is not supposed to be a hard/rigorous problem after all, since you are doing approximation and some assumptions before starting the calculations.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

How do I calculate Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Ground state wavelength and uncertainty Bohr/deBroglie model
Replies
1
Views
2K
Uncertainty in Wavelength Calculation from Wave Crests on a Pier
Replies
6
Views
2K
What is the Orbit of Hydrogen Atom for an Electron at 734 km/s?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Rejecting the Semiclassical Bohr Model: Examining the Uncertainty Relation
Replies
1
Views
2K
Quantum Theory of Earth Satellite Analogy to Bohr Model
Replies
5
Views
3K
Solving Bohr Atom Problem (Qs a-e)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Calculate the minimum uncertainty
Replies
5
Views
8K
Bohr-Sommerfeld model question "Old" Quantum Theory
Replies
8
Views
3K
Setting up an Uncertainty Problem
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top