Exploring Orbital Angular Momentum & Magnetic Moments

In summary, the conversation discusses the connection between orbital angular momentum and intrinsic particle spin. The speaker considers the idea of a connection between the two and the potential for different spin values, but ultimately concludes that only half-integer spin values are possible due to the topology of the rotation group. They also mention the possibility of a general relativistic explanation for the topology of space.
  • #1
MadRocketSci2
48
1
So, I've been looking into orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments, (which, at least in normal space with a normal angular topology seems limited to integer values of spin). (My model so far has been a parabolic potential harmonic oscillator in 3d, and the sort of spinning modes you can construct from a basis of degenerate modes at each energy level).

I've sort of been stubbornly clinging to the idea that there is a connection between the orbital angular momentum of scalar particles in a potential well of some sort (one where there must be some large energy difference between the ground state and any other state, otherwise you would expect to see series of particles at different spin energies), and the sort of angular momentum exhibited by "intrinsic particle spin." (Points don't have moments, dangit! Except as some sort of limit around a ball going to zero size.)

My understanding is that for spin-1/2 particles, the sort of "internal azimuthal wavefunction" for the scalar sub-particle-in-some-sort-of-well has to be distributed over a space with a weird topology. (In the language that I've read so far: The Spin-Group has the same set of generators as the normal rotation group, but a different topology such that it takes a rotation of 4pi along any combination of the unit-infintessimal generators to return to what is regarded as an equivalent point.) (I have to wonder if in reality, then, we actually have more rotational scope than is apparent, hidden from us by some symmetry)

Okay, so we can generate a "double-covering" space, where two distinct (opposed) points on the sphere correspond to the same points on the normal 3-sphere. (For points away from the origin, there are circles and tracks of "equivalent points in 3-space" that are not equivalent in the double covering space). Do I have this so far?

Why just a double covering space? It seems to me, if I am free to chop the topology of the space within which this wavefunction exists any way I want, there would be nothing preventing me from positing "quadruple-covering-spaces" and spin 1/4 particles, "8x covering spaces" and spin 1/8 particles and so on. Why do we only end up with spin 1/2?

(Again, pursuing my idea that there is something down there actually spinning around, given that it must be happening at something approaching the speed of light, I wonder if a general relativistic effect can explain the weird topology of this space.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
MadRocketSci2 said:
(Points don't have moments, dangit! Except as some sort of limit around a ball going to zero size.)
It's not just a point. An elementary particle with spin is described by a multicomponent quantity (spinor, vector, etc) at that point, and under a rotation the components go into linear combinations of each other. In QM, if an object changes under rotations, that is exactly what we mean by angular momentum.

The Spin-Group has the same set of generators as the normal rotation group, but a different topology such that it takes a rotation of 4pi along any combination of the unit-infintessimal generators to return to what is regarded as an equivalent point.)
Okay, so we can generate a "double-covering" space, where two distinct (opposed) points on the sphere correspond to the same points on the normal 3-sphere. Why just a double covering space? It seems to me, if I am free to chop the topology of the space within which this wavefunction exists any way I want, there would be nothing preventing me from positing "quadruple-covering-spaces" and spin 1/4 particles, "8x covering spaces" and spin 1/8 particles and so on. Why do we only end up with spin 1/2?
An element in the 3-D rotation group SO(3) can be represented by a vector pointing along the axis of rotation, with length equal to the angle of rotation. The angle is at most π. Such vectors fill up a sphere of radius π, and diametrically opposite points on the surface of the sphere are considered the same point.

Consider closed paths (loops) in this group space, the interior of the sphere. These represent a continuous series of group operations. Some can be shrunk all the way down to a single point. Any series of group operations that can be deformed to a point is the identity. Some cannot be reduced to the identity in this way. For example a diameter is a closed loop, since its two points on the surface are identified, and cannot be shrunk. But a path that goes through the sphere twice actually can be deformed and shrunk to a point. In fact, a path that goes through any even number of times can be shrunk, while a path that goes through 3 times, or any odd number of times, cannot be. This means the rotation group is doubly connected.

So there exists another group, SU(2), the universal covering group of SO(3), which covers it twice and itself is simply connected. All loops in SU(2) can be deformed to a point. An object which forms a representation of SU(2) may require a double loop in SO(3) (a 4π rotation) to go into itself, and is consequently a half-integer spin object.

But this doubling can't be repeated, because SU(2) is simply connected. ALL loops in SU(2) can be shrunk to a point, and consequently all objects must go into themselves under a single loop. So there can't be any such thing as a fractional spin object, except for half-integer ones.

(Again, pursuing my idea that there is something down there actually spinning around, given that it must be happening at something approaching the speed of light, I wonder if a general relativistic effect can explain the weird topology of this space.)
Idle nonsense. :frown:
 
Last edited:

1. What is orbital angular momentum?

Orbital angular momentum is a physical quantity that describes the rotational motion of a particle or system of particles around a fixed point. It is a vector quantity that depends on the mass, velocity, and distance from the fixed point.

2. How is orbital angular momentum related to magnetic moments?

Orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments are closely related because the motion of charged particles in an orbit creates a magnetic field. This magnetic field is aligned with the axis of rotation, giving the particle a magnetic moment.

3. How do scientists explore orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments?

Scientists use various experimental techniques, such as electron spin resonance spectroscopy, to study the properties of orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments. They also use theoretical models and computer simulations to understand their behavior.

4. What are some real-world applications of orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments?

These concepts have numerous applications in modern technology, such as in magnetic storage devices (e.g. hard drives), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in medicine, and in particle accelerators used in research.

5. Can orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments be manipulated?

Yes, scientists have found ways to manipulate and control the orbital angular momentum and magnetic moments of particles using external magnetic fields, laser beams, and other techniques. This has opened up new possibilities for information storage, communication, and quantum computing.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
800
Replies
6
Views
783
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
805
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
801
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
526
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top