MHB Exponential Functions Problem, find k and a in f(x)=ka^(−x)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the exponential function f(x) = ka^(-x) for specific parameters k and a, as well as determining x1 and demonstrating a property of the function. The correct value for k is established as 8, while a is found to be the positive square root of 2. The value of x1 is confirmed to be 2. Participants verify the method of showing that an increase of 2 units in x results in a 50% reduction in f(x) by comparing function values at x and x+2. The conversation concludes with successful verification of the calculations and methods used.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am trying to solve the following problem:

In the given graph, we see the function:

\[f(x)=ka^{-x} , x\geq 0\]

View attachment 8053

1) Find k and a

2) Find x1

3) Show that an increase of 2 units in x brings a 50% reduction in the value of the function f.

I have tried solving it, but taking two known points from the graph and putting them in the function. I got immediately that:

\[k=8\]

and than less clear, that:

\[a=-\sqrt{2}\]

In the matter of fact, I got two solutions, a solution without the minus sign was there too, but it didn't match the given points...so in order to solve (2), I just guessed and checked my guess.

I am not sure how to show number (3).

Can you kindly verify that my solution is correct and assist with section 3 ? What am I missing with the multiple solutions for a ?

Thank you in advance !
 

Attachments

  • 11.PNG
    11.PNG
    13.7 KB · Views: 118
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel.

1) $k=8$ is correct. To find $a$, solve $8a^{-4}=2$ for $a$. Can you continue? (Hint: Choose the positive root.)

2) Solve $8a^{-x_1}=4$ for $x_1$. Okay?

3) We'll complete this after the two exercises above. :)
 
Hi,

If I am not mistaken a is equal to the square root of 2.

Then x1 is 2. Correct ?
 
That's correct. :)
 
So...how do we continue with number 3 then ? :-)

I took the function we get, put x+2 instead of x and divided the value of f with x by the value of f with x+2. Got 2. Is if sufficient ?
 
Certainly is. Good work! :D
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top