Falling electric dipole contradicts the equivalence principle?

In summary, the electric dipole spontaneously accelerates away from gravity, but an observer in free fall will see it move towards them.
  • #1
jcap
170
12
Consider an electric dipole consisting of charges ##q## and ##-q##, both of mass ##m##, separated by a distance ##d##.

If the dipole is given an acceleration ##a## perpendicular to its moment the total electric force on it, due to each charge acting on the other, is given approximately by
$$F_e=\frac{e^2a}{c^2d}$$
where we introduce ##e^2 \equiv q^2/4\pi\epsilon_0## for clarity. The exact expression is given in Electrostatic Levitation of a Dipole Eq(5) (http://inspirehep.net/record/206900/files/slac-pub-3529.pdf).

Now suppose the dipole, initially oriented horizontally, is dropped in a vertical gravitational field of strength ##g##.

Applying Newton's second law to the dipole as a whole we have: gravitational force (gravitational mass times field strength) plus electric force must equal the inertial mass times acceleration
$$2mg+F_e=2m a$$
Therefore the acceleration ##a## of the dipole is given by
$$a=g\large(1-\frac{e^2}{2mc^2d}\large)^{-1}$$
Thus the dipole is accelerating faster than gravity. An observer falling with the dipole will see it move away from him whereas in deep space the observer would not see the dipole move away.

Surely this contradicts the equivalence principle?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • #3
Actually, if you read the reference, there is no need for global effects, The reference itself uses the POE to predict a gravitation effect, which they then explain.

1) The dipole spontaneously accelerates far away from gravity, in an inertial frame.
2) In a rocket whose acceleration matches the the dipole’s, the dipole will appear to float.

is equivalent to the following on a planet of the right mass and size, over a small region, for a short time (the locality of the POE):

1) The dipole spontaneously accelerates in a free fall frame.
2) The dipole floats in a stationary frame.

The key is that the dipole under discussion is not just neutral matter, it is analogous to a small rocket, with an intrinsic acceleration.

The reference also goes on to state why this theroretical effect can never be achieved in practice.
 
  • #4
[tex]-\frac{e^2}{dc^2}[/tex] in your Fe forluma is electromagnetic interaction energy/c^2. So mass of the system M is
[tex]M=2m - \frac{e^2}{dc^2} < 2m [/tex] of separate charges. If not dipole but pair of charges of same signature, [tex]M=2m + \frac{e^2}{dc^2} > 2m [/tex].

May I regard your case same as if a single particle of mass M falls in the gravitational field?
 
Last edited:

What is the equivalence principle?

The equivalence principle is a fundamental concept in physics that states that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration. This means that in a small region of space, an observer cannot tell the difference between being in a gravitational field and being in an accelerated reference frame.

What is an electric dipole?

An electric dipole is a pair of equal and opposite charges separated by a small distance. This creates a dipole moment, which is a measure of the strength and direction of the dipole.

How does a falling electric dipole contradict the equivalence principle?

The equivalence principle states that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration. However, in the case of a falling electric dipole, the dipole moment experiences a torque due to the electric field, which is not present in the case of a falling mass. This contradicts the principle, as the effects of gravity and acceleration are not equivalent in this scenario.

What are the implications of this contradiction?

If the equivalence principle is violated, it would have significant implications for our understanding of gravity and the laws of physics. It could potentially lead to the development of a new theory that can better explain the behavior of electric dipoles in a gravitational field.

Is there any evidence to support this contradiction?

Currently, there is no experimental evidence to support the idea that a falling electric dipole contradicts the equivalence principle. However, this is an area of ongoing research and further studies may provide new insights into the behavior of electric dipoles in gravitational fields.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
898
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
931
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
906
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
769
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top