Microsoft has announced that if computer makers wish to distribute machines with the Windows 8 compatibility logo, they will have to implement a measure called "Secure Boot." However, it is currently up for grabs whether this technology will live up to its name, or will instead earn the name Restricted Boot.
When done correctly, "Secure Boot" is designed to protect against malware by preventing computers from loading unauthorized binary programs when booting. In practice, this means that computers implementing it won't boot unauthorized operating systems -- including initially authorized systems that have been modified without being re-approved.
This could be a feature deserving of the name, as long as the user is able to authorize the programs she wants to use, so she can run free software written and modified by herself or people she trusts. However, we are concerned that Microsoft and hardware manufacturers will implement these boot restrictions in a way that will prevent users from booting anything other than Windows. In this case, we are better off calling the technology Restricted Boot, since such a requirement would be a disastrous restriction on computer users and not a security feature at all.
Please add your name to the following statement, to show computer manufacturers, governments, and Microsoft that you care about this freedom and will work to protect it...
Antiphon said:Allowing whole new os's to be booted-? Pay the fee if you want to play.
How odd - "she".This could be a feature deserving of the name, as long as the user is able to authorize the programs she wants to use, so she can run free software written and modified by herself or people she trusts.
dalcde said:Suppose you share a laptop. And the other person wants Windows. Very few laptops come with Linux pre-installed, so we probably want to buy a laptop with Windows and install Linux. But you can't. (OK, I know you can. But seriously. Changing BIOS settings? Not something I'd like to do to simply get linux boot)
The Microsoft Monopoly refers to the dominant market position and control of the software industry that Microsoft has held for many years. It is the result of Microsoft's business practices and anti-competitive behavior, which have led to limited competition and consumer choice.
The fight against the Microsoft Monopoly is important because it has a significant impact on the technology industry and consumers. By controlling a large portion of the software market, Microsoft has the power to dictate prices, limit innovation, and stifle competition. This can lead to higher prices for consumers and less variety in products and services.
Over the years, various legal actions have been taken to combat the Microsoft Monopoly, including antitrust lawsuits and government investigations. In 2001, Microsoft was found to be in violation of antitrust laws and was ordered to be split into two separate companies, but this decision was later overturned. In recent years, there have also been efforts to promote open-source software and alternative operating systems to decrease Microsoft's dominance.
The consequences of the Microsoft Monopoly can include higher prices for consumers, limited innovation, and decreased competition. It can also discourage smaller software companies from entering the market and hinder the development of new technologies. Additionally, the control of such a large portion of the software industry by one company can have a negative impact on the overall economy.
While there is no simple solution to the Microsoft Monopoly, there are steps that can be taken to promote fair competition and reduce their dominance. This includes enforcing antitrust laws, promoting open-source software, and supporting alternative operating systems. It is also important for consumers to be aware of their choices and support companies that offer alternatives to Microsoft products.