Find the Equivalent Impedance of the Network

In summary: Thanks. I'll use what I got but flip the sign of the real part. So ##Z_{RL} = 4540 + 4990j##. Then we compute the capacitors impedance ##Z_C = -j(1/(wC) = -j (\frac{1}{2\pi (440)(10^{-7}}) = -3620j##. Then we use the series-parallel conversion formulas to get the equivalent impedance of the network. ##Z_{eq} = Z_{RL} + Z_{C} = 4540 +...+3620 = 10850##
  • #1
rtareen
162
32
TL;DR Summary
Problem is from Faissler's Intro to Modern Electronics Chapter 8. We are asked to find the equivalent impedance of the network. Nothing is in series or parallel so I don't know what to do.
Network.jpg


We are asked to find the equivalent impedance of the network. Nothing is in series or parallel so I don't know what to do. We cannot use mesh equations or Thevenin's theorem because is no current or voltage source. So I have no clue.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I believe the issue here is not this particular circuit, but that you've haven't quite understood what "in parallel" and "in series" means.

What is the definition of two elements being connected in parallel?
In series?
 
  • #3
f95toli said:
I believe the issue here is not this particular circuit, but that you've haven't quite understood what "in parallel" and "in series" means.

What is the definition of two elements being connected in parallel?
In series?

I know in series means if a current flows through the first component, that entire current must flow through the second. Parallel is a little vague. I think they have the same voltage across them they are in parallel. But since there is no voltage source here that definition would lead to all three being in parallel. I don't know any general definition that always works. Can you teach me the definiton?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
It does depend on frequency of course. Is a frequency specified?
 
  • #5
tech99 said:
It does depend on frequency of course. Is a frequency specified?
Yes 440 Hz
 
  • #6
There are formulas for converting series combinations to parallel and vice versa. You need to apply this to R and L to obtain the series equivalent, then the combination is in series with C. The two series reactances can then be combined into one by addition.
 
  • #7
tech99 said:
There are formulas for converting series combinations to parallel and vice versa. You need to apply this to R and L to obtain the series equivalent, then the combination is in series with C. The two series reactances can then be combined into one by addition.
I know the formulas, but I don't know how to tell that R and L are in series?
 
  • #8
L and R are in parallel. First of all, find the reactance of L at 440Hz. Then do the conversion to of L and R in parallel to series elements. Then ask again about the next step!
 
  • #9
tech99 said:
L and R are in parallel. First of all, find the reactance of L at 440Hz. Then do the conversion to of L and R in parallel to series elements. Then ask again about the next step!
How do you know that they are in parallel?
 
  • #10
R and L have both their ends connected together, they share the same voltage.
 
  • #11
tech99 said:
R and L have both their ends connected together, they share the same voltage.
Yes but doesn't having a capacitor or even an input/output wire in between disrupt that? I deleted my work it was completely off
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Once you are comfortable understanding series and parallel resistance equivalents. Look at this video about how to use the substitution for series and/or parallel resistors to simplify more complex combinations of impedances. It's the same process with inductors and capacitors. Initially just call everything "Z" (Z1, Z2, Z3, etc.), some complex impedance value, and treat it like it's a resistor. After you have solved the circuit (or part of it, if you like), then you can substitute the complex value for each "Z"; like ## Z=\frac{1}{jωC} ## for a capacitor, etc.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/circuits-topic/circuits-resistance/v/circuits-part-4
 
  • Like
Likes rtareen
  • #13
rtareen said:
Yes but doesn't having a capacitor or even an input/output wire in between disrupt that? Anyways here is my work so far.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/281897
This looks in the right ballpark, which I roughly estimated as 5000 + j5000. But resistance should not be negative. The next move is to connect this in series with the capacitor. So next find the reactance of the capacitor at 440Hz.
 
  • Like
Likes rtareen
  • #14
DaveE said:
Once you are comfortable understanding series and parallel resistance equivalents. Look at this video about how to use the substitution for series and/or parallel resistors to simplify more complex combinations of impedances. It's the same process with inductors and capacitors. Initially just call everything "Z" (Z1, Z2, Z3, etc.), some complex impedance value, and treat it like it's a resistor. After you have solved the circuit (or part of it, if you like), then you can substitute the complex value for each "Z"; like ## Z=\frac{1}{jωC} ## for a capacitor, etc.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/circuits-topic/circuits-resistance/v/circuits-part-4
Unfortunately, the parallel combination involves conversion to admittances, adding admittances and then converting back to impedances, which is a complication for the OP. That is why I suggested just using the series-parallel conversion formulas.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE
  • #15
tech99 said:
Unfortunately, the parallel combination involves conversion to admittances, adding admittances and then converting back to impedances, which is a complication for the OP. That is why I suggested just using the series-parallel conversion formulas.
Thanks. I'll use what I got but flip the sign of the real part. So ##Z_{RL} = 4540 + 4990j##. Then we compute the capacitors impedance ##Z_C = -j(1/(wC) = -j (\frac{1}{2\pi (440)(10^{-7}}) = -3620j##. Then we use

##Z_{eq} = Z_{RL} + Z_{C} = 4540 + (4990 -3620)j = 4540 + 1370j~\Omega##

However the book, which I don't trust, said the answer is 1157 -419j ohms. This book is full of mistakes though. I've already caught three. What do you think?
 
  • #16
rtareen said:
Thanks. I'll use what I got but flip the sign of the real part. So ##Z_{RL} = 4540 + 4990j##. Then we compute the capacitors impedance ##Z_C = -j(1/(wC) = -j (\frac{1}{2\pi (440)(10^{-7}}) = -3620j##. Then we use

##Z_{eq} = Z_{RL} + Z_{C} = 4540 + (4990 -3620)j = 4540 + 1370j~\Omega##

However the book, which I don't trust, said the answer is 1157 -419j ohms. This book is full of mistakes though. I've already caught three. What do you think?
I like your answer better. I found 4542.5 - 1361.9j

Good work!

Edit: Oops typo: it's 4542.5 + 1361.9j
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes rtareen
  • #17
DaveE said:
I like your answer better. I found 4542.5 - 1361.9j

Good work!
Woohoo !
 
  • #18
Maybe it's time for a different book?
 
  • Love
Likes Tom.G
  • #19
DaveE said:
Maybe it's time for a different book?
I'm only using this book because its supposedly used in this electronics class at my university. If you have any recommendations I wouldn't mind checking out some others.
 

What is the definition of equivalent impedance?

Equivalent impedance is the single impedance value that represents the combined effect of all the individual impedances in a network. It is used to simplify complex circuits and make calculations easier.

How do you calculate the equivalent impedance of a network?

The equivalent impedance of a network can be calculated by using Ohm's law and Kirchhoff's laws. First, calculate the total resistance by adding all the resistances in series or using the reciprocal formula for resistors in parallel. Then, use the formula for capacitors and inductors in series and parallel to calculate the total reactance. Finally, use the Pythagorean theorem to combine the resistance and reactance values to get the equivalent impedance.

What is the difference between series and parallel equivalent impedance?

In series circuits, the equivalent impedance is the sum of the individual impedances, while in parallel circuits, the reciprocal of the equivalent impedance is the sum of the reciprocals of the individual impedances. This means that in series circuits, the equivalent impedance will always be greater than any individual impedance, while in parallel circuits, the equivalent impedance will always be less than any individual impedance.

Why is it important to find the equivalent impedance of a network?

Finding the equivalent impedance of a network is important because it allows us to simplify complex circuits and make calculations easier. It also helps in understanding the overall behavior of a circuit and in designing and troubleshooting electrical systems.

What are some practical applications of equivalent impedance calculations?

Equivalent impedance calculations are used in a variety of applications, such as designing electrical circuits, analyzing power systems, and determining the performance of electronic devices. They are also used in fields such as telecommunications, audio engineering, and power electronics.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
895
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
663
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
472
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top